I highly recommend this film! One of the reasons is that the movie is a bit difficult to understand (the second one is that I also like this film very much), the film reviews I have seen seem to be difficult to understand about the film, but there is no mention of the logic, and the film seems to be too niche , I hope someone can watch this film and discuss the plot with me. The movie seems to be rather gloomy and depressing, which is also to my liking. The hand-held camera, the black and white and cold images, the uncomfortable flickering light and shadow, the continuous sound of rainstorm, etc. all make people feel depressed, but this kind of depression is also a kind of beauty. It seems that the logic of the story is relatively clear in the early stage, but as the plot progresses, the logic makes me a little unclear. (The next paragraph is a strong spoiler spoiler!!! The picture also has spoilers!!) Look at the pictures in order, the second picture, this picture, there are two scenes in the movie. The logical relationship between these two scenes and the movies before and after is not very clear, and they appeared twice. Both times, the uncle appeared after he was in a coma. What about the countless self imagined by the uncle?), and the latter, the uncle is the observed. If these two scenarios are deleted, the logic seems to make a lot of sense. Are these two scenarios just imaginary rather than objective? Look at the pictures 3 and 4. These two shots appeared after the uncle was beaten by the cameraman in the abandoned factory. The picture is from the uncle's perspective. Men "long" out of the waist? ! It seems to be controlled by the cameraman? ! It makes me feel both real and illusory, and I don't know if it's true or not. Figures 5 and 6 are taken together (group), seven and eight are taken together (group), the same action was filmed into two parts, and they were interspersed in the scene one after the other, and the content of the shots was completely different. The female protagonist of 5 or 6 seems to turn around and stroke the chest of the photoshooter, and the shots of 78 and 8 are shifted. It turns out that the female protagonist just took off her earphones, and there is only a piece of clothing behind her. The shot between the two sets of shots is of the uncle going upstairs, and the photoshooter turning back ( Figure 9), and then a gunshot rang out, but there was obviously no man taking pictures in the hostess's house! There is also a camera in the front explaining that the photo shooter is on the phone with the hostess in his own home! It can be inferred from this that seeing the man taking the photo is just an illusion of the uncle, and the uncle killed the heroine! After the gunshots, the shot turned into the uncle drowning again (Figure 10). It was obviously the uncle who fired the shot. How did the shot turn into the uncle drowning? ! Then the camera turned again, and there was a voice, "Is this hell?" This voice was the man who took the photo (according to the close-up of the man before the gunshot) or the uncle's (accompanied by the uncle's drowning scene), I watched it several times and still couldn't understand! After that, the uncle and the heroine sat in the sound of sirens. love, more It's like Uncle's own imagination! I watched the film as a whole, and I watched the details countless times, but I still didn’t understand the above discussion. I have not seen others discuss the above discussion elsewhere. !
View more about A Snake of June reviews
