When we were children, many of these esoteric philosophical questions were asked: "Why was I born?", "Why was I born here and not there?", "Why me?" … The moment of memory formation passes quickly, and the moment of becoming aware of oneself through constant feedback from the outside world will come back in the period of gradual contact with others. This time, they came with some fresh blood and more sophistication.
Every day, the farce that breaks through the moral concept is still being staged, not only in France, but also everywhere. But who of us can turn a moral question into a comedy like Rohmer? Childhood problems come and go, and they become transcendent moral problems that we have difficulty understanding and solving. We become helpless in the face of betrayal and deviation from mainstream beliefs. It is difficult for us to accept and deal with events beyond our experience.
Those questions have long been complicated beyond our experience: "Why am I, what am I?", "When am I going to die? What kind of scene will it be? What will I think before I die? Will it be? Afraid?", "How do those lovers guarantee their loyalty for life?", "Why do you have to get married after so many parting moments?", "Do I have to do all of these? What a boring life it would be, You can see the end at a glance!", "Why me, what's the meaning?"
When problems have arisen, we will always accept and endure them subconsciously. What do you think will happen when the same thing happens to us as Brasha and Leah? Bystanders will condemn, and the parties are indignant and unable to understand the "misguided" behavior. There are many reasons for this trend, one of which is the mainstream concept. We have learned, only learned, that partnership equals loyalty, that is, during this partnership, both parties must maintain loyalty, and the loyalty here is in the marriage relationship. Being transitioned and inherited "naturally", this kind of cognition has become the common cognition of all individuals in the current social field. We assume that all people love and marry on the premise of this kind of consensus. Experience is also validating and strengthening this consensus at the same time. Once an abnormal event occurs, the person who destroys the consensus will become the target of crusade.
Loyalty, however, is never something that can be permanently established in a relationship. Certainty exists, and it is accompanied by the attribute of time, as in the words of Married Life (Trüffaut 1970): "At eight I am in love with her, at nine I am disgusted." Like, we A consensus has been reached that all people must maintain perpetual tolerance while they are alive. The practice and perception of a certain trait (loyalty, tolerance, viciousness) forced to assume its perpetual continuance becomes laughable, even terrifying.
"In any case, God in himself is not merely an essence that exists necessarily or blindly . In other words, even though that self-imposed existence is always based on a necessary existence, the actual, actual existence of God is no longer merely a necessary existence.
Life consists precisely in the freedom to be able to sublate its own existence as an immediate existence posited independently of itself, and to transform it into a self posited existence. On the other hand, a dead thing in nature has no freedom, cannot change its own existence, how it exists, and always exists as it does—in its entire existence, its existence is not determined by itself. ” (Proceedings of the Schelling University of Munich)
When this mandatory consensus invades our lives, first of all, we do not allow physical immorality, and then we strictly guard against ideological deviance, and "consensus" thus becomes a weapon to suppress freedom, and I do not me again.
Of course, we also need to maintain these good characteristics, tolerance, kindness, loyalty... But we can't go against nature, we can't ignore the universal existence of uncertainty, maintaining sincerity and goodness is still our consensus, and in this consensus There is also a position of uncertainty, from which we can then reach a new consensus, which is free and sincere:
That is, when I say "love", I love you right now.
View more about Boyfriends and Girlfriends reviews
