I like "Smile of the Mona Lisa", not only because it is a cast of all beautiful women. This film expresses many ideas that I like: 1. In our knowledge system, how much is original and insightful, rather than copying the text, just a second-hand dealer of ideas; 2. In our photos, How many smiles are real, from the heart, not from rigid facial movements; 3. We can easily copy art treasures, even Van Gogh’s masterpieces, which are similar to tracing, but can we draw the "in our heart" "Sunflower"; 4. We are not anyone's supporting role, especially women, they have sacrificed themselves too much for the family; 5. As teachers, don't try to save anyone, the most important thing is to let them learn to be themselves; 6 People who give up easily are wanderers aimlessly, but those who wander for ideals are truly brave.
In terms of actor roles, I like Maggie Gyllenhaal the most. Her provocative eyes are so charming and sexy. She looks like my best friend Mao Mao. Her role is a lively free and easy model. Christine Dunst’s role is the epitome of Wesleyan Girls’ School, sacrificed for the family, suffering, tangled, and forbearing, but still on the surface is the best wife. She chose to reject at the end of the film. The biggest bright spot. The role of Julia Styles represents another category. She still chose to focus on the family after she thought it over. She was wise. Besides, I don’t think Dunst is pretty, except for "Elizabethtown." In this film, Stales is obviously much better than in "The Bourne". She can act, but I don’t like that face, just like I don’t like Reese Withers. Peng, they have similar facial contours.
http://prepare.blogbus.com/logs/18061269.html
View more about Mona Lisa Smile reviews
