Hunting, as the core of this film, I think the interpretation is quite good, although I also agree with the plot, including the setting of the world view, I am also very puzzled (if I understand correctly, the setting should only be the bankruptcy of the country, not the suffering of Ecological extinction, why did it become a "no man's land"), and there are also doubts about firearms (since cars and mobile phones have been upgraded, why are firearms still at the modern level)... In short, there are more details. No scrutiny!
But, the point of this film is quite obvious - I think it is very brilliant for the portrayal of the hunter's "death gaze". From the beginning, the back/profile of Killer Han appeared on the camera, and the looming face, when chasing and killing the escaped trio, followed suit, as if the cheetah in the dark depths was staring at the prey's every move, the photography of this piece is quite brilliant, he created The tension that comes out is a good interpretation of the "hunting" proposition.
Also, I'm trying to understand why the text is set in a barbaric world under anarchy. When all social rules are destroyed, and modern civilization returns to the rules of the primitive world, everyone is like an animal in the jungle, or hunting, or becoming a prey, always be vigilant, maybe you are also being caught in the eyes of a pair of hunters , death stare!
View more about Time to Hunt reviews
