There are very few videos on everyone. Recently, I picked up this old British drama and watched it, and the more I watched it, the better it became.
Many people with incomplete legal knowledge and lack of understanding of the British legal system can only see whether these arguments are acceptable from the perspective of ordinary people, and record them to be updated at any time.
Episode 1
The heroine firmly believes in "defense of innocence". Because of the unfairness of the law enforcement process, the parties are acquitted. It appears many times in the drama, is this right or wrong? How does the heroine find her own beliefs in secular standards, legal standards, and professional ethics? She believes in innocence, she believes in evidence, she believes in her clients. The client deceived her and finally sent the badge of proof, which she would choose to hand over.
Episode 2
rape case. It is gratifying that such issues have also been discussed in China, but at present the focus is more on the fact that women should stand up, which is already a big step forward. The focus of this drama is obviously deeper. The percentage of cases where Rape can appeal successfully is very low, and it is extremely difficult to obtain evidence. This episode discusses how to define rape, women feel violated and men feel normal sex, however, only yes means yes.
The heroine realized that the plaintiff was violated, but she still helped the defendant win the lawsuit. Not guilty until proven, this may be the principle that the heroine believes in, defending the interests of the client by herself, and the result is ruled by jury.
Episode 3
The police fished and enforced the law, but the procedure was not fair, and the suspect was acquitted. Among them, juvenile suspects were released on bail by lawyers at great risk, but they still disappeared to see pimps, and even missed their mother's funeral.
Episode 4
racism. This angle breaks the rules (old aesthetics), and the remarks made by two close colleagues to joke in private are reported by a third person. Is this racial discrimination? The heroine did not deny this remark, but explained the meaning of the speech and the story behind it. The meaning of the lawyer was expanded again, and she tried her best to explain and explain the mood of the client at that time.
Episode 5
Furious and maimed teacher. As the prosecution lawyer in this episode, the heroine sensitively discovered the defendant's hidden feelings, and realized that as the prosecution lawyer, it is not for the purpose of winning for her own side, but to try her best to restore the truth of the facts. There is a balance here.
Episode 6
The justice of the process and the correctness of the result, which one do you choose? The heroine chose the ideal process, and her client was exonerated and then tortured to death. She tried her best, had the courage to fight against the gangster forces, but the ending was sad. There seems to be no answer to this discussion, and the heroine will never take up the case of the lawyer who has no bottom line.
View more about Silk reviews
