As far as the title I set for my film review is concerned, it will not be accepted by most people, but I think some of them will understand what I want to express.
1. Who caused this situation?
Poor: I have worked so hard, why am I still so poor and getting poorer. So why are they so rich? And when I put down my dignity to ask for help, they were so rich that they didn't want to lend me a little bit. They really had no conscience at all, and they didn't deserve so much money.
Rich people: We have formed a government, and the policy is formulated in consultation with you poor people. In the process of formulating the policy, I also made concessions. Therefore, the system is so good, but you are still living so badly. Don't blame yourself, can you blame me? Get the hell out of here, you rubbish!
Government: Those rich people are not benevolent to the rich, and they are greedy for profit! ! Those poor people are scoundrels and lawless! !
In my opinion, these are the factors that cause the overall collapse of this society. People in every position have no control over their inner evil, and people in every position do not feel that they are at fault (the rich do not help, the poor do robbery, The government's negligence and shirk responsibility), people in each position cannot understand the difficulties of people in other positions. Not that someone deliberately designed this situation.
2. This time, the government is the biggest conspirator.
Obviously, in this conflict, the government did not choose to mediate, but chose to profit from it and become the biggest winner, killing the rich and the poor.
2.1. The government's inaction (not shown in the film), the rich are not benevolent to the rich, which led to the riots of the poor.
2.2. After the riots, the government "witted" the use of the army, demarcated the safe zone, only to maintain the law and order in the safe zone, and casual chaos outside the safe zone. The poor are very "witty" not to rush to the safe zone to force the army, and the rich who survived the disaster are also very "witty" to move into the safe zone. I guess they will scold each other in their hearts at this time: "Aren't you very good at ordinary times, look at your cowardice now, there is a kind of you to come out!", "A poor ghost is a poor ghost, I still have a home here, there is a kind of come again"
2.3 The government chooses to take advantage of the fire and kill both ends: using the mob incident to kidnap the rich and let the rich pay the ransom. In fact, when you think about it, this is a particularly detailed, creepy, and basically flawless design.
2.3.1 Although the civilians know that the army took the girl away, in a turbulent era, who can prove that it is not someone else's disguise, that it is not a rebel, that it is the real government person? What's more, it was already under military control at this time, and there was absolutely no information between the rich and the poor to play, and the rich did not know where his girl went.
2.3.2 After a month, I ask my family for 10 million yuan, and I don't say a word at all. Because the more you say, the more flaws. In short this girl must die, because as long as she lives she will identify the army. So the rest depends on how useful this girl is. If the money comes as soon as you ask for it, you can keep asking for it. Until there is no more money to be made or this is about to show a hole.
2.3.3 I don't know if the two soldiers asked for money privately, whether it was Plan B of the army (because the family called the police), or because the two soldiers thought the money was too small and decided to ask for it themselves. But in the end, the girl was abused and died at the servant's house, and the servant became the scapegoat. Although the government unfortunately failed to rescue the hostages this time, the case was successfully resolved, one robber was killed, and another robber was caught. Then you can proudly publicize, "How difficult it is to build the country", "We are great, bright and correct", and "The victim's family is emotionally stable." If you want a small amount of money, you can get as much as you want. Of course I can't find out that the government is a rogue, but I can find out that your domestic servant is a rogue, or actually just a black sheep in the government. So I found two soldiers and promised to give them some money, and then they went to the rich man's servant, and the servant sent a message to get the money. So the final solution is to take off the masks of the two "black sheep" in front of the servants, to show that this is their personal behavior, and to tie these four people together, making them all conspired. Then the soldiers came to destroy the corpse, the girl brought it to the servant's house to kill and framed it for the servant, and the male servant was directly shot dead, and the servant girl was brought back to trial, and the death was uncontested. The explanation for asking for money privately is that the actions of the pawn broke the general's big game. So the general wanted to kill these soldiers to vent his anger and establish his dignity, and the servants belonged to the aftermath.
3. The individual is too small, who can see the whole thing clearly, who can save himself, who can save others? If God does not act, who can be saved?
3.1 The mob kills the rich just because they hate the rich; the rich do not save the poor, because they look down on them, because they only have money in their eyes; the government is designed to eat people without spitting out their bones. These people have no one else in their hearts, and the gods and Buddhas can’t save them, which is justified; 3.2 The girls and servants, these are people who are willing to try their best to care for others in this troubled time, but their personal strength is too small, and they do not dare to resist, the same Nor did a savior appear to save them from their misery. That is, good people are not rewarded, right? 3.3 The question is, should good people be rewarded? This may just be a gimmick by various religions to "deceive" people. Buddhists say that doing good deeds can lead to Buddhahood, Taoism says that by doing good deeds for heaven, one can obtain the Tao. Christ said that being righteous will lead to salvation. After listening to more, people will establish a logical relationship between good people and good retribution. But Buddhists also say "no desires, no desires", Taoists say "follow the orders of heaven", and Christians say "only God is in control of everything". If you can't let go of the "good fruit" in Buddhism, you can't get rid of delusional thoughts; if you think of ways to avoid calamities, how can you be called "according to the heavens"; you must have a good result that you think, until you are in power or a god In power? So, why "go against the sky"? Why do you have to work hard to become a superior person? You have to work hard to do this and that. Doesn't it mean that you are disobedient to the arrangements of the gods and Buddhas? 3.4 After I understand 3.3, I think it can be relieved. Just like how we thought differently when we were young and when we were old, in this world, everyone’s life is different. So many people formed this big network and contributed to so many things happening. Some people will understand, some people just don't. When the time is up, you will naturally understand (remember the words of the Buddhists on TV: You are not in the world, or you are exhausted).
4. This is a dystopian story, with a dark ending, of course. I don't know the world after death, so I can't tell whether the ending of these people in the film is good or bad. In addition, so far, I still use the word good or bad, maybe in a higher realm, not to evaluate things in terms of good or bad.
5. For this film, the only thing that is not played is "Salvation". When the rich oppress the poor, when the poor kill the rich, and when others are bullied, everyone chooses to succumb to violence, and no one can choose to stand up to defend the justice in their hearts. This may be the reason why the world in the film is not worth saving by the gods and Buddhas, so maybe before the gods and Buddhas save us, we must save ourselves first.
View more about New Order reviews
