Advocating strength, advocating morality, advocating principles. This sentence sums up my opinion. I don't understand why fights will always exist in Japanese and Korean youth movies. Is there a cultural difference? Fighting was indeed considered to be a manly performance when I was young, and it was a common thing to hang out when I was a child. When I grew up, I realized that although violence can be a means of defending oneself, the things that can be solved with violence are trivial things. Of course, sometimes I feel that it is justified to travel around the world. spoken. Morality is reflected in this sentence: men should be bare-handed (maybe because the translation of the subtitle group will be slightly different, which is roughly what it means). The use of knives is disdainful, and even his own accomplices will be beaten. Pursue power and win and lose while eliminating all means of victory! In these fight scenes, when it comes to heads-up, the opponent won't do it until the opponent stands up and throws a fist at each other again.
What I don't understand is why the fight? One by one, they worked so hard, every time they were blood splattered, and they would never stop until one side fell. But what are the beliefs that underpin them? Is the word lily of the valley? Love for this place where you've only been three years? Forgive me, I don't think it's a school at all, it's just a gathering place, a temporary residence for the crows, they will fly away one day. And the last narration about freedom pushed me into the abyss of chaos again. What does this movie want to express?
The most spoofed afterthought is probably this: Japanese people really have respect for food. Even before he was about to bleed, Narumi-san respectfully thanked the food. On the contrary, we, a famous family who started from farming, do not care so much about food. This is also what we need to learn.
View more about Kurôzu zero II reviews
