This article originally had a relatively popular title, called the most stupid princess and the most hypocritical story in Disney history. But when it was released, I remembered that someone once told me that the articles I wrote were too offensive and out of date, so I temporarily changed it to the current topic. Of course, someone once said to me that the quotations of the essays I wrote were too uncommon and not suitable for the general public. this. . . . . . This is not easy to handle. But my understanding is that the friends who pay attention to my essay are basically knowledgeable and knowledgeable. Even if I say a few uncommon words occasionally, I will give you a reminder. Get up, it should have little effect. So, at the beginning, let me explain what is meant by "home wish"-Confucius said, "home wish" is the enemy of virtue. Mencius later explained what Confucius said, describing the "hometown wish" and said a very wonderful sentence. I really can't help but not quote the original text: "Nothing is done without thorns, and there is no thorn. It seems to be faithful, it seems to be honest, everyone is happy, self-righteous, and can't be in the way of Yao and Shun." The person who speaks the wish of the hometown, if you want to pick his fault, it seems that there is nothing wrong with it. If you want to attack him, you have no shortcomings and cater to it. Like a layman, he conforms to the bad customs of the world, looks like a serious person, everyone likes him, and he feels good about himself, but in fact he does not have the principles and standpoint of being a human being. He deliberately greets and sells well, just for his own self-interest. . . . . . .
When I say this, do you all think of some acquaintances around you? Well, there are actually quite a few such people. But in our harmonious social environment, if you point out that no one seems to be suitable, let's just cite another example blindly. There are many short stories about Buddhism invented locally in my country. They are not found in Sanskrit classics, but they are all persuaded to learn from good teachers. The stories are generally structured like this-someone eats fast and recites the Buddha and does good deeds, so they finally get good rewards. , What is goodness? Generally, they are born to have sons, become officials, make big fortunes, and live as thieves. Of course, in order to show that this kind of thing is scientific, there should be a control group, so there is another bad guy with sores on his head and pus on the soles of his feet. He was finally struck by thunder. died. . . . . . I guess many people have heard similar stories. So what is this story? First of all, it must be to teach people a good story, but can it achieve the goal? I think it's choking. Because the method used to entice others to learn well is the secular greed of becoming an official to make a fortune and having a son to live a long life, while the method to warn others to learn badly is death. Then when the promised benefits cannot be fulfilled, and the punishment will not come, will people who have learned well under the temptation and intimidation continue? Probably not? So this kind of story is called the story of the wish of the village, or in layman's terms, the story of hypocrisy.
Am I pulling too far? Come back quickly and let's talk about this new Disney movie. It's about trust between people. The structure of the film is actually quite rigorous. The two clues of trust, light and dark, echo back and forth, telling us that the disaster caused by distrust, and finally disappeared from the invisible due to trust, not only brings additional benefits-all dragons All came back from the resurrection. . . . . . It's a good story and a good movie with educational significance, except for one thing-Disney really treats everyone who watches movies as fools.
First of all, I just ask one question-if the dragon ball really has the ability to bring all dragons back to life, and if the trust is really so great, why was the dragon ball made for the first time five hundred years ago and there was a living dragon with all the dragons? When the blessing of trust was released, the effect was only to drive away the dark forces, but did not bring the other stone dragons back to life, and even the only surviving dragon fell into a deep sleep? Who is the one who said yes to stand up and explain this scientific truth to me first?
There is a particularly good old saying in China, which is called listen to what you say and watch what you do. Trust is not spoken by the mouth. You lied to me to hurt me once, twice or three times. Now you are holding the second thumb of the crossbow with the upper string and filled arrow on the trigger, pointing at me and telling me that you trust me. Me, because it is inferred from common sense that you have a high probability of treating me as a fool. In the same way, in the beginning of the movie, in the section "The Five Great Nations Rebellion Against the Heart, Two Princesses Contest for the Jade", you said that Dragon Ball is not a weapon of mass destruction, but why is it that your country of heart is delicious and happy? You said that because you are lucky, let me trust you, go home honestly and endure, bring people into the dragon heart, so as to fulfill your imperial spring dream? Why? Just rely on your reincarnation to cast a place? Princes and generals, would you rather have a kind? So I said that although Disney is screaming for equal rights on the surface, the protagonist and supporting role in the whole film are not white, but the way of thinking is still the way of thinking during the KKK period. This movie is definitely in the economic recession, the global right wing A deformed fruit of populist forces rising.
So does this film have the "same as the popular, in line with the defilement" mentioned in the keyword of the previous village wish? This is a bit offensive. Let me just talk about my personal opinion. At the beginning, little Raya and her dad came out to wink the eyebrows, the small talk between little Raya and little Nammari Social, and all the performances of Sisu, the last water dragon-if you are a British and American soap opera If you have seen enough, you may agree with me-it is very low-level, or another good word-the very down-to-earth interpretation method is completely inconsistent with the identity of the princess or the fetish. As for why this is so? My dark guess is that during the epidemic, the film industry was greatly impacted, and it generally turned to online screening. Disney needs to please the lower-level people who have a larger population and lack other entertainment methods to fill the time to get more income. ?
The logic of the whole film can be said to be extremely messy. The solution to the problem is finally pinned on a hypothesis that lacks both experience and empirical evidence, which makes it successful. Of course, it can be said that the screenwriter deliberately used this method. Prove that the boss of the Kingdom of Hearts did not lie before-we are lucky. . . . . . Regarding things like luck, of course people like me who have always been unlucky have to shut up, but if someone in reality tells me about karma with such a fabricated story, it will make me believe in what kind of absolute behavior. Can bring me good luck, I will probably tell him, go to your mother. . . . . . So probably I can only continue to stay sensible and unlucky-sure enough, my fate is determined by my character. . . . . . .
View more about Raya and the Last Dragon reviews
