I think it’s still okay, the score of 5.7 is low. From the beginning, the film presents the plot and details with the game screen and animation illustrations, just to tell the audience that this is not a feature film with a rigorous plot, and it is not serious from the beginning. The storytelling is just a light-hearted and nonsensical movie. Do you think it would be abrupt and contradictory if there was a plot of using fruit as a weapon in Stephen Chow's movie? (After all, you can beat ghosts with chocolate.) It may be that nonsensical movies gradually withdraw from the stage and people forget this feeling for too long, and it is the relationship between the stars and the audience's high expectations. I quite like this kind of shooting method, it is considered to be trendy after all, and Eddie Peng's role feels very foreshadowing, it should be more interesting, it depends on how it develops later.
Maybe the reason why he failed as a nonsensical movie was because he didn't have enough laughs.
View more about Tai ji 1: Cong ling kai shi reviews
