Energy is conserved and everything is interdependent. Everything stands in a unique position in various balances, and it occupies one new high point after another in a chic manner. Finally, we shouted: Let the world balance itself, let us put down the butcher knife and become a Buddha on the spot.
Balance is the greatest original sin.
In the past, I also complained about human nature. I feel that in all kinds of bizarre situations, human nature makes the world a less beautiful place. We are like plastic dolls, finding a balance among various institutions and then moving forward, gluttony; sometimes these institutions are the laws of nature. So we murdered nature, and nature in turn avenged us.
We feel the importance of balance, the checks and balances that balance has on us. At the same time, we take balance as the first law.
Therefore, no matter in the social system or the laws of nature, we often emphasize balance, emphasizing that what we gain is what we lose, what we suffer is cheap, and when we make a profit, we have to lose, and some people succeed, some people fail. , we can also build communism to balance the unfair status quo, of course, the new system is still balanced. Therefore, balance is also our pursuit, or fair/unfair balance is our pursuit.
However, at this moment I have some doubts, is the balance of all things really an unbreakable commandment? Does it have to be from one equilibrium to another? Is it possible to always maintain an imbalance, it can be to break the gravitational force, or it can be to break the rules, and no rules will be formed in the rules (of course, it can be considered that no rules are a kind of rules).
I'm not confident this has an answer or result. But think about it as a proposition.
Is there a certain balance? Stealing the fulcrum can replace an unbalanced hypothesis. In addition, can there be any other?
View more about Balance reviews
