2009-06-09 22:18:02: Latte
can also get the box with five people, one of them slowly pushed the box to the middle point, and the other four also Walk slowly to the midpoint, and finally put the box on the midpoint, and you can hear the music when the five people surround it.
2009-04-27 16:05:34: milu (God forbid, free shipping is also available) No, no.
He could indeed get the box again. But not the way you said.
Doesn't he have a fishing rod in his pocket?
He could hold the box with a fishing rod, and go inside by himself while pulling it toward him.
It is certainly possible to do so mechanically.
2009-05-22 18:28:19: Rhino (t.sina.com/hellorhino) If there is only one person, there is only one posture left in balance.
2009-07-26 01:19:43: Cowardly children (no matter how long you go, it's not to the grave) There must be a moral bottom line (basic rules of the game) Everyone obeys them, otherwise they won't be able to play.
2010-01-24 22:34:01: moonshine Now think about it, if it just represents age, you can count whatever number you want.
There may be a delicate balance between these numbers.
Or, it doesn't make any sense at all.
Maybe there were originally 1000s, or 100s, but after balancing and fighting over and over again and again, these few people were left in the end.
2009-12-26 22:38:58 From: Moonshine (Chongqing) Could
it represent age~
No. 51 (middle-aged) contributed the most, hooked up the box and unscrewed the music,
No. 75 (authority of the elderly) shot People, Zhen Jing Everyone
No. 77 is the only one who died inexplicably without touching the box. The
last left is No. 23~~
The youngest and the most ignorant~~ The one who has been intoxicated in music for the longest time~~
dances to the beat The ~ ~ easily bewitched by desire.
2007-12-08 18:03:18 From: Quaternary (Uh, buy bread and condensed milk in combination~~)
When the other three people walk to the other end of the board, it is a "moral" behavior, because the situation at that time is actually very dangerous. The first person to step back is making a dangerous move. It was on the verge of collapse, and the behavior of the other three people was to protect the balance of the system when they were young, and to help others get the box when they were young. Of course, this is their self-protection behavior at the same time. The morality I want to speak of is such a "morality of maintenance". The purpose of a utilitarian is to obtain benefits, he wants to reach out to the benefits, and the benefits are limited (that's why people have to fight), so there must be games between people. What kind of person is strong? My definition is: the person who analyzes the game situation in the fastest time and takes action immediately, preferably can also create a new game strategy (because if it is always a strategy, the whole game will be lost before the new conditions arise. Stuck in an infinite loop - the "box" is always sliding between endpoints), in short - the "smart" and "brave" people. We can think that the person who retreats has already thought clearly: as long as he retreats, others must walk across from him, and this behavior kills two birds with one stone: both he gets the box and drives others farther away from the box. . Who is the weak? - People who can't make decisions right away. Here we do not rule out the possibility that they may not have figured out the situation. People with relatively low IQs are always weak. Therefore, the "maintenance morality" that I want to propose is something that the weak must do. This is an "objectively necessary" moral behavior, and he has to be expelled by this game disadvantage to maintain the balance of the system. , they take the initiative to be "moral" people must also be "moral" people, "morality" is their obligation. A weak person may wake up and become a strong person after suffering a loss, but as a group of "weak", no matter how the specific weak members change, their game predicament will not change, as long as they still dare not make a decision.
2011-07-01 13:08:47 From: hazelsun
There is a place I don't understand at the beginning, why does the first person do the same thing when he pulls out the fishing rod? After all, according to the principle of moment balance, it will not affect whether a fishing rod is extended or shortened, put in clothes or taken out (excluding the change of center of gravity). So their definition of balance may not be weight, but all movements, to be the same.
Just like during the Cold War, when the United States had an atomic bomb, so did the Soviet Union; when Gagarin of the Soviet Union went to the sky, the Americans went to the moon. Only such a scenario can constitute a balance.
2010-11-14 22:20:06 From: The most beautiful (make a mark for yourself)
Nothing else, in many ways I miss the foreign version of the three monks
View more about Balance reviews
