Brave and innocent child, teacher beyond reproach

Vergie 2022-04-22 07:01:54

Licking is to deceive the audience, which is one; not letting children speak up will hurt their self-esteem and suppress their nature, which is the second; and the risk of causing children to resist rebellion, which is the third.

But I still feel that the teacher has nothing to blame. She just wants to win the award and wants those talented children to get the honor they deserve. At the same time, she cannot refuse the participation of other ordinary children, so she can only choose to let them sing silently in their hearts. The last resort.

Is it better to point out to Sophie and the others that they are not talented enough, and then cruelly refuse them to join? Or accept them all and let them all open their voices and sing freely, only to end up being a mediocre glee group, and it's better to bury Lisa's singing talent? I'm not sure, so I won't blame the teacher too much. And from Lisa and the teacher when they were hard-faced during practice, it can be seen that the teacher has considered the children's self-esteem. She has never disclosed to everyone who is lacking in ability and talent who needs to lip-synch, and she will help them. Confidentiality, so that they can also become members of the best choir, is actually protecting the children's self-esteem. Of course, the teacher also gave a back way. If you are really dissatisfied with this arrangement, the child can also quit the choir directly. It can be seen that the teacher's approach is not without logic.

In fact, to be honest, on the stage, when the teacher said "you can't treat me like this", and when the teacher left the stage from calm and calm to the final loss, I felt sorry for her. I think, if the child is dissatisfied, he can communicate with the teacher well, and even if it is bad, he can sing in a choir that does not have such high requirements. The ruthless "revenge" at a critical moment can really easily hurt others.

Of course, having said so much for the teacher, I still pay tribute to these brave, innocent and beautiful children! I hope they can always be enthusiastic and have the courage to fight against the bad system!

View more about Sing reviews

Extended Reading
  • Syble 2022-01-29 08:12:22

    Children only distinguish right from wrong, adults only see the pros and cons. The little people are so beautiful and vivid, how could they be willing to make them sad?

  • Gloria 2022-03-15 09:01:11

    The choir is the epitome of the whole society, and the secret of the choir is also the unspoken rule of the society's operation - the public creates lies, obliterates individuality, and creates a perfect appearance, so as to maximize collective interests. However, as an independent individual, do you choose to enter the lie, become a part of the lie, and maintain the illusion of harmony and beauty like everyone else? Or become the early bird who exposes lies, fights collectivism with individualism, and fights for the right to speak freely? This is an unsolved problem. The former has its own set of logical and rigorous explanations, and the latter also has the desire to follow the inner voice. So the story sets the choir members as children, and that innocence is enough to tip the balance in the audience's heart. What's more, most adults have almost lost the courage to question and resist authority, and only young children still hold idealism.

Top cast