In the choir, there are always people who sing well, and some who don't. What would you choose to do if the teacher made you, who were mediocrely talented, to sing silently? The first time is of course to oppose and protest, because it is not fair. But the teacher told you that your silence is also a part of your efforts. Your grievances can achieve a collective honor. What would you do? To be honest, this “sacrifice the ego, achieve the big picture” mentality is deeply ingrained in my generation. I acquiesced in my heart that the teacher's words were right. Besides, this honor did not belong to others, but to the whole group. The name in this group had me. Not everyone has a natural voice, so they too have a chance to participate. (Even in silent singing) The winner can go to Sweden, just show up and get a compliment, why not? We stand as a bystander and discuss the interests of others, which is the attitude of the most standing and talking without back pain. Twenty or thirty children in the choir could so unanimously oppose the teacher, which is more like an anti-collectivist revolution, which is impossible in reality. In other words, so many pronouncing children have worked so hard for months of music, and then they are in vain, so why should they go? A music teacher has an index command on the top, and there are only so many children below who are willing to participate in the singing and chorus class. What should she do? If the sound was bad, she could just let them go back and not use it, but she stayed, presumably a clever woman who can't cook without rice. There are a few imperfect voices, but they can reach the best level in the country. Should they be silent? The answer depends on what you are after. These gangs are children, and they want fairness. But in the face of interests, how many things are truly "fair"? History is always written by the victors!
View more about Sing reviews
