Using the time app's scorer is 8.2 points.
I won't talk about the directing techniques, actors' performances, storyline, and audio-visual aspects. I want to focus on the film's point of view.
First of all, I know that you are very moved after reading it, but I think there is one point that you should make clear: Although the price of medicine is set high, the manufacturer of genuine medicines is a research and development company that independently develops and sells it at a high price. Distributors who buy this drug into their own hands and sell them at a high price (here is just a hypothetical example for comparison). Without the latter's monopoly of supply, the drugs can be sold at a fair price, and the common people will benefit. Therefore, you can say that their drug prices are too high and impersonal, but it is still fundamentally different from the immoral behavior of eating human blood steamed buns. (“I don’t care how much manpower and material resources you spent on your drug in the previous research and development stage. Anyway, you are so expensive now, so much higher than the cost of materials and craftsmanship, that I can’t buy it, you It just has no conscience"...) Isn't this a moral kidnapping? ? ? The cost of this drug's research and development stage is extremely high (it is said to be as high as billions of dollars?), and the proliferation of pirated drugs has not only caused economic losses to the research and development parties, but also violated their intellectual property rights, and if the pirated drugs are flooded, they will be severely hit The enthusiasm for the development of other drugs in the future, thereby hindering the progress of medicine. Therefore, pirated drugs should never be promoted, and it is an absolute evil for the pharmaceutical industry. However, the male protagonist later sold pirated drugs at zero cost (or even lost money later), which indeed helped countless patients who could not afford the drugs and saved countless lives. For the common people, this was a proper act of kindness. To sum up, the act of introducing pirated drugs and selling them at zero cost or even at a loss is essentially "robbing the rich to help the poor". If the film can divide the proportion of "robbing the rich" and "helping the poor" into five or five, the male protagonist will be made into a "fake medicine man" who uses illegal means to act chivalrous and righteous, and whether to talk about "law" or "love" "The question is thrown to the audience to think for themselves, then the film will rise to a new level. But the authors didn't shoot like this... This film avoids talking about "robbing the rich". We didn't see how much the R&D company suffered, nor did we see the negative impact of the proliferation of pirated drugs on the industry. In a TV interview In the show, the drug representative didn't mention these things, and even lied that "pirated drugs are ineffective". The film not only did not list the genuine drug side as a victim of the proliferation of pirated drugs, but also portrayed the genuine drug side's "only recognize the drug." Money shameless" ugly face, and even the police have become "villains" who only talk about the law but not human feelings. The film basically shows "helping the poor". We have seen the struggle and pain of the people. The appearance of the male protagonist is like helping the poor. He is the hero of the people. This film did not make the male protagonist both good and evil The "Xia", but the male protagonist became the "Saint" who finally found his conscience. This method of shooting is actually quite opportunistic. It can more effectively use the audience's "empathy" and convert it into word-of-mouth and box office, and it may also make the audience have the illusion of "fake medicine is right". Therefore, in movie theaters After I had a good time, I looked back and thought about it carefully. The three views of this film are really not as positive as some comments said. But after all, the original intention of this film is to speak up for the people, not to promote fake drugs, so I still have to give it a good review, and I really enjoyed watching it and was very moved. At this stage, China still needs more films that speak out for the people. So the above said so much, not to criticize, but to regret that the film's "insufficient point of view". Finally, give a thumbs up to the health insurance policy.
View more about Dying to Survive reviews
