The feature of this movie is just like its title, giving a lot of details, and many shots are closer, for example, about vehicles, it's really drive me crazy! Because I don’t understand cars, sometimes I can’t judge whether it’s a car or not... But I tried to watch it twice! ...
Then discuss this movie, it must be spoiled, and the second time I watched it, I will look at the previous plot with problems after the known ending. I still look tired. On the one hand, there are too many threads, and on the other hand, the picture is too dark. I think it’s the director’s ability to write the audience with a lot of details, but it’s a bit bullying to make the screen unclear.
————————— Spoiler, this movie spoiler can’t be seen———————————————
First: There are several killers in this movie: at least two, or even more
There is a very clear feature, that is, the case of the deceased man wearing a plastic bag, which is also the three-corpse homicide case that Deakon (the character in Washington) did not solve five years ago (there was a female victim who was killed by Deakon by mistake) plus later A dark-haired girl named Julie died in the apartment. A total of four victims. This was probably done by one person, whether Leto's character killed it, not sure. Then there were one or more assassins who hunted women on the roads, and actually did not solve the case. To emphasize, I do not agree that the two killers are divided according to the killing of prostitutes and the killing of ordinary people. I think the killer is divided according to the different ways of committing the crime. Does the killer have to kill the prostitute, or is not the prostitute? Do they really care?
Second: Was the man who started chasing the little girl on the road? Is it Albert Sparma, who Leto later played? It seems that the translation is called Spama? ? no.
Why not? Many people analyzed gait, vehicle color and so on. I looked back and focused on this. The male killer has short hair, no beard, and the car is blue. So Spama can’t put a fake beard on to face the police, nor can he grow a long beard so quickly.
So this killer was not found in the end. I don't know if it was the same person who killed the running girl Rongda, maybe not just this one.
Third: The car that kills the running girl is the one below, which seems to be brown, or it may have changed color due to the light.
Later, Spamma told Jimmy (Jim Baxter, the role played by Marek) that you got the original photo, which means that Jimmy got the original photo of the missing person notice from the girl’s parents. It can only show that he is concerned about this disappearance.
Fourth: How many victims are there in total? This is what gives me the most headache. It is necessary to stroke again.
Of the three victims five years ago, this is the clearest. It is worth mentioning that Mary Robb, who was killed by Dickon by mistake, was stabbed in the midfielder, and it is very likely that she would also bleed to death. But in any case, Deacon's mistakes cannot be washed away. These three people are like ghosts, lingering around Dickon. His career, family, and health were all ruined.
Then back to the main timeline of the movie, and Dickon started to get evidence. There were already four victims (not including the girl who escaped at the beginning).
Then after Dickon came, Julie died in the apartment, plus a dead woman who didn't know who died by the river. Plus the missing Rongda.
It was determined that there were six bodies.
Jimmy's judgment, there are at least two killers. One kills prostitutes, the other kills ordinary women. I agree that there are at least two killers, but they are not divided into prostitutes and ordinary people. In fact, I disagree. This may be his own prejudice, I will talk about it later.
But here is the problem. Which of these women are prostitutes?
Fifth: The identity of the female victim
First of all, all three of them five years ago were prostitutes. Then the main timeline, six dead, five of them seem to be unable to determine their identity (four Dickon died before he arrived, and one corpse of a woman by the river), and I don't know if it was a prostitute. Then Julie, who died in her own house (actually the rented house), is a very important contradiction.
Julie seems to be well educated, so she is unlikely to be a prostitute. But the place where she lives looks very shabby, so it seems uncertain whether she will be engaged in sex work. So Jimmy Jr. is going to investigate people around him, including prostitutes. But I think the murderer may not choose the victim based on this point at all. After all, her death, the evil taste of putting a plastic bag on her head, was different from other corpses during this period. But doesn't it necessarily have to be done by one person five years ago? Very likely. Not sure again! ! ! Broke.
We know that this Stan was also not cleaned up by Dickon five years ago. He didn't know if he was the murderer, obviously Dickon didn't think he was. It's too scary after all. But he may be a spectator. So is the feature of covering plastic bags spread among them? Although Julie's death is similar to the three of them five years ago, I think it was probably done by one person. But there is no definite evidence. There is no definite evidence for all the conclusions in this movie. This is really frustrating.
Then there was another Rongda who hadn't found the body, and most likely died. Her disappearance may have driven Jimmy mad. When he went to someone's house and saw Rongda's parents, he probably thought of his daughter and wife. So he was very persistent to solve the case later, and even chose to disagree with the procedure, just thinking that one day he would be like that old couple. What should I do...
View more about The Little Things reviews
