Although I have been baptized by horror films such as "Eye in the Mountains" and "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre", but after watching "Warren", I still can't tell the fear and depression. "Pressed and shocked.
Because it is different from the perverted murders in European and American horror films, the perverted vendettas and exterminations of the ethnic groups in "Warren" are all real, and they have been happening since ancient times, both at home and abroad.
In my opinion, from a street fight between two people, to group fights, regional conflicts, ethnic conflicts, international conflicts, and even the so-called clash of civilizations, in the final analysis, it is nothing but a struggle for survival and interests, the difference is only the level (platform) of the subject. On the other hand, with the "platform" as the boundary, the conflict has internal and external nature. The platform is both a restraint of internal conflicts and a participant of external conflicts. For example, when two gangs in the underworld are fighting for territory, if there is a strong person, they will quell or even suppress the conflict, so as to maintain the overall balance and further expand outward; when they reach a higher social platform, social managers will To balance the interests of the underworld and the normal society, so as to maintain the stability of the entire society. The same is true at the national level. It needs to be stable internally and compete with other countries externally. At this time, the United Nations, the wto, etc. are needed to be peacemakers.
From this basic logic, the following points can be deduced:
1. Down to the individual, up to the country, conflict is inevitable, this is Darwin's law; the so-called forging swords into plows is just an accident, Ratzelism is the theme, this is naked jungle animality, are Warren's mob cruel? ? In the country where Bibi launched World War II, hundreds of millions of deaths, let alone anyone;
2. Since it is unavoidable, is it feasible to cancel these subjects? I’m afraid it will be worse, at least internal conflicts can’t be managed, so anarchism and the idea of world citizens can’t be solved. Look at Warren’s performance in the power vacuum after the withdrawal of the Soviet Union and the Nazis, the rabble;
3. From this point of view, the idea of communism is indeed logically reasonable - replacing the conflict of interests of the population with class conflict is actually closer to the essence of the conflict. In the film, the Soviet Union, the Nazis, the Polish , Wu, and indeed only the Soviet Union's behavior is more "civilized". However, the reason why human communist practice is in trouble, within the scope of our discussion, is probably because it only focuses on interests, and it is difficult to do a good job of increasing interests. In the end, it is difficult to suppress internal conflicts and external competitions; While modern society is based on protecting private property and increasing social welfare to maintain internal stability, the ever-expanding interest requirements and high welfare costs may intensify external conflicts, which is one of the reasons for the stability and turmoil after World War II;
4. The so-called collectivism, nationalism, and nationalism are all self-interested to maintain the platform; of course, selfishness is not terrible, maybe it can be used as a motivating force, what is terrible is that it is unrestrained and becomes a destructive force, which is sad The latter is the norm;
5. From all points of view, this problem seems to be unsolvable. Therefore, even though modern people have a lot of consensus on a common destiny, primitive conflicts are still endless. This is the original sin of mankind. Under pessimism, what is even more pessimistic is that under the zero-sum game of interests, those who are full want to eat well all the time, and those who are hungry want to be full, and people can no longer manage so much;
6. Don't believe in the self-consciousness of the rabble;
7. Only when there is a higher competition platform, or an external threat, can human beings establish a more powerful restraint and balance mechanism from within. Therefore, in recent years, terrorism and environmental issues have become global hot topics; of course, if a planet hits the earth, alien invasion, etc., it will be easier for human beings to group together, but it is based on the product of remembering what to eat and not to fight. sex, difficult
8. Religion and morality are another binding force other than the platform, but the problem with them is that it is still people who master and interpret them, so many times they become the platform’s accomplices, religious wars, and revolutions of various colors. There are many.
Going back to "Warren", the criticism of pure humanitarianism has been fully expressed, but what can it be? It can increase the awe of human beings, but it cannot change the endless reality. It's a headache to think about, let's watch "The Sewing Machine Band" again, which is both entertaining and positive.
View more about Hatred reviews
