I saw the existential crisis that women still have to this day, but I don't quite understand the artistic expression of this film. The relationship between the two people is not reasonable enough, which leads to the loss of tension in the first kiss, and a small question mark pops up on the top of the head. The author or director gave a very specific time and place, and when I watched it, my reason kept pulling - could I not get it because I didn't understand modern American history? What was life like in rural America in 1851? Real and freehand confusion. I can't tell which direction the director is going to take... (It seems to be a little more freehand?) The rhythm of the film is not neat, of course, neatness is not a standard, but compared to the terribly neat "Burning Girl", I am in this film. I was sleepy several times in the emotional line of the play. In addition, I remember that the branch in the opening scene is gradually focusing like a nerve. It may echo the perspective of the two heroines under the tree in the wild, or it may have a deeper metaphor. But this shot is placed at the beginning, is it really an effective narrative? ? The overall shot of the film is good-looking, there is no lack of artistic processing, and the theme is also angular. But I still hope that under the label of "lesbian", there will be more precise perceptions, reflections, and expressions in different forms.
View more about The World to Come reviews
