The combination of 3 and 4 may still keep up with the level of 1 or 2. 1 is that the documentary film crew encountered giant pythons and professional hunters during the filming of the tribe in search of mystery. 2 is the scientific research team of the pharmaceutical factory looking for blood orchids and sampling. The white male director untied the blood orchids as the cause of the genetic mutation of the pythons. 3 It is the drug factory’s anti-bioethical research that uses blood orchids and genetic reforms to transform other snakes. 4 It is the pharmaceutical factory’s private research on mixed blood orchids and genetic reforms that snakes can sever limbs and regenerate. 1 is a relatively ordinary B-level film, but the quality and level of the actors are higher than 2, and 2 is also a relatively ordinary B-level film. The actors have a large number of votes and have nothing to do with the movies I have seen, but their acting skills are not much worse than 1. The plot of 2 is relatively rich, the adventure scenes and plots of the bottom of the cave and jungle are all (1 is on the river most of the time, and finally fights and escapes in the factory), the little black brother almost contracted all the panic and screaming performances of the whole film , 1 is superior to 2 in terms of thinking "the hunting and intrusion of the virgin forest by the passer-by", so it is a bit like letting the python and the predator hunt each other, and the python slaughter everyone indiscriminately (mutual retribution, also in line with In that era, the film applied a template in the ideology). 2 is better than 1 is his basic setting for deepening the Anaconda series, introducing two settings of blood orchid and pharmaceutical factory, which constitutes blood orchid entering the biological chain to produce pythons and pharmaceutical factory employees’ conflicts of interest, scientific research vision, survival and other issues The trade-off between. 3 and 4 are rotten, like a small-cost movie that runs two theaters, 3 is like a temporary expansion of a bunch of fish actors, leaving the good-looking or third- and fourth-line green leaf actors in 4.
View more about Anaconda reviews
