No love, no war.

Dwight 2022-11-27 17:27:57

Different people watch movies from different angles. I have never commented on the movie, or I saw it by accident. I haven't read the original book. I only look at it from my own perspective. This is not a war movie, nor is it a pure love movie, it is just a process of a boy becoming a man through the baptism of love war.

The male protagonist has freckles on his face, but his acting skills are quite good. The film uses a lot of silent scenes to highlight the inner world of the male protagonist. The male protagonist met the female protagonist when he was a boy at the age of 20. At that time, the female protagonist already had married couple. Many people spurn extramarital affairs, but in this film, it is obvious that from the first shot, the male protagonist fell in love with the female protagonist at first sight. If you do not understand, take a closer look at the male protagonist when the female protagonist walks from a distance. Her eyes were a little dull and a little ecstatic. In the age of a young boy, this kind of love at first sight cannot be restrained. The heroine is also confused by the hot eyes of this foreign boy because of her unhappy marriage, and there are several scenes of their rivals. The shooting is very delicate, and many comrades mentioned the scene on the ship, yes. Although it is only a close-up of the foot, it is enough for SEX. The suppressed emotions finally broke out one day when the heroine's husband was not at home. I can't write too many spoilers. So, from behind. The male protagonist and the female protagonist left together, and the female protagonist left him quietly, which was a big blow to him. When he participated in the battle, he never forgot this woman in his heart. Someone mentioned the German movie "The Reader". I think it is a bit similar, But most of them are not. The male protagonist didn't know why he left him until he finally figured out the reason. After the heroine and the hero eloped, one day, the heroine's sister came to see them. The hostess said: You see how we are, and my sister said: I am very happy. The male protagonist asked his sister: How do you think you are doing? (roughly meaning). This actually shows that the male protagonist doesn't know what the female protagonist actually needs at the moment? He was still a child, and he loved her beyond reproach. But don't know how. He doubted himself. So he asked his sister how he was doing? The final fuse was of course because he said he didn't want children and the heroine left him. Although this reason is too far-fetched. But it also shows that the male protagonist does not have the ability to be responsible for a man at this moment. The heroine returned to her former home and had children. And her husband. All this is responsibility. For the young male protagonist, he doesn't understand.

Back to war. Friends made by the male protagonist during the war. Note that the one who started saving him was the one he nearly killed. He was caught sleeping while he was on duty. To be honest, he was a little selfish. But in the end it didn't kill him. So much so that he was saved in the end. So that in the end they became best friends. The male protagonist suffered the sacrifice of his companions and the departure of his friends in the war. In particular: We have loved and been loved. There is a section in the middle. When the male protagonist found out that he had a child, he still couldn't accept it. Run away as if running away. . . . But the end of the movie. The war is over. He went back to his child. He seemed to feel that he should take on the role of father. At this moment, he is completely two people from when he was 20 years old. .

I don't want to see some common sense mistakes in the war scenes in the film. I just watched the video and it uses a lot of things to illustrate the growth of a man. Very finely shot. If you blindly pursue war scenes, watch the second part. Blindly pursue the love scene and watch the first one.

View more about Birdsong reviews

Related Articles