Who said this thing is imitating Hayao Miyazaki, this statement is nonsense, and it really has nothing to do with Hayao Miyazaki, I didn't even stick to the side of the imitation. It's really boring to discuss who comes first among the various elements in it. I will go to the cinema or go to the so-called fine art of the masses, but is this really worth your praise? I don't think the nine-color deer are well drawn. The background is grand enough, but As far as the current special effects production method is concerned, this is really gross. It's not that the domestic animation has not been brilliant, and now I can't even find the original original intention. Why should I praise this kind of work that has regressed to a barely passing level? It's still 12 years. ~~~~
I don't want to talk about this three views. If we have the same three views, we can all become soul mates. There are many movies with bad views, and we don't care about domestic and foreign countries. The key is to be a movie, especially As an animation, where is the plot? Either you have the ability to pretend to be literary enough, or the plot is enough to catch people. You can use the advantages of animation to tell the story. Again, the animation is young enough to be considered a function of animation. , it turned out to be hairy? I almost fell asleep in the second half, the boring plot, the procrastination. The setting of the characters and those interesting images as fantasy animation lies in the advancement of the plot and the presentation of details, but Big Fish and Begonia are out of touch in these two aspects. There is any promotion effect, and in turn, the plot has nothing to do with these images, what is the significance of this. bored to death.
How did this kind of thing become what people expect? Is it because the marketing is too good, or we, as the audience, are generally too cheap, and who comes first?
View more about Big Fish & Begonia reviews
