First of all, I haven't read this novel, and I don't know what this novel is about at all, and then I haven't tracked any According to news reports, I don't know what this film has at all. The only thing I know is that the actor has Feng Shaofeng (and at first I thought the other actor was Zhao Youting...), because I have seen the poster from a distance. He was selected for the movie of the same period because the evaluation of "Tianjiang Xiongshi" was not very high, and his mother said that he thought Feng Shaofeng was very handsome (here I want to add one more thing, for the Spring Festival, let the audience understand whether this is a family fun or not Movies are really important, and then I despise the ratings of Chinese movies again, and I think it’s very haha when I think of parents taking their very young children to the cinema to watch “No Man’s Land”).
Then let me tell you my initial guess about the film (forgive me for not knowing anything about the title alone): I thought it was a story of a teenager who adopted a wolf and ruled the grasslands - yes, I thought it was a movie A commercial film full of rights wars, but in fact this is a literary film about man and nature.
Attendance rate: 90%
——————————————————————————————
This film can be given 75 points as a whole, most of which are films The lens and the wolf, it can be said that it is worth going to the cinema for these. The grassland scenery is really beautiful. The soundtrack is good. Actor here I have some confusion. The idea of the film is clear, and it also makes me feel very shocked. The confrontation between man and wolf (nature) really makes people reflect.
The character
is probably because I haven't read the original book, so there is a bit of the biggest confusion: what is the meaning of the character Yang Ke (Dou)? He neither grew up, nor helped the protagonist grow, nor created any situation. He had a relationship with the girl from the grassland, but he didn't make any choice about this relationship. I thought he would become Chen Zhen (Feng ornaments) In terms of feelings, there is no negative side. He showed his educated youth friendship with Chen Zhen, but this friendship did not make people feel irreplaceable. So what is the value of his existence? Did the screenwriter really cut corners on his settings?
I don't have anything special to say about Dou's performance, it seems natural in the film, and I think it's okay for a young actor like him.
Another point of this film is that the protagonist has not grown up, and what I feel throughout the film is that Chen Zhen is so self-willed. Although I can interpret it, the focus of this film is not on the characters but on the relationship between man and nature: from the nature's coexistence to the final life break. So if you think about it this way, Chen Zhen was the destroyer from the very beginning—he wanted to tame a wolf, to the end he became a defender—he let go of his little wolf. But in the process, I didn't feel his choice - he didn't have a choice, he just went with the development. That's the main reason why this character is not impressive enough, for which I can't say it's the actor's fault entirely, but Feng really didn't show a boy-to-man transformation in his acting, didn't show that when he needs to take responsibility, he Inner struggle and pain, he seems to be at ease from beginning to end, and even in terms of body shape, he has never eaten meat and has not lost any weight (of course, this may be a system problem, like I can't lose weight)
local actors, it can be said that it is all natural, and this The place is very suitable and makes people feel comfortable, but the empty character is a common problem (for example, the Mongolian who betrayed the grassland for the radio at the beginning, he is not very good, he just lives well...).
oh oh! The heroine is very good.
Story
Through this movie, we can make a little guess about the story of the original book, which is probably the growth of the two young people after they came to the grassland and the stories of various people on the grassland, and then show the confrontation between man and nature in the background (or Disobedience is more accurate), it looks like the movie, right? But I believe that the description of human nature in the original book must be more profound, and the focus of the film is more on people and nature. Although it seems to be more grand, it is easy to make the film lose its resonance without the introduction of small characters. , the audience doesn't know what to watch, just as the actors don't know where they're going.
The picture
is beautiful. Very grand.
For someone like me who wants to go out and has no chance, it is indeed a visual feast. The final result is to increase the helplessness that I want to see but know that there is little hope...
shot
I saw some teachers commented that the camera lens is not used well, I think it's pretty good, at least you didn't get stuck when watching it in the cinema, and also used the lens very well to fool the audience and cover up some performance problems , it shows the vastness of nature and the insignificance of human beings very well. A lot of art is very beautiful. For example, there is a scene of a wolf chasing a horse in the film. All in all, it's comfortable to watch in a movie theater. I don't understand the
sound part, but it's still the same word, very comfortable. Finally, I want to say: the wolf's handling of the wolf is really good, no matter what the survival habits of the wolf actually are, but it is completely believable in the film. They are more beautiful in nature than any human being, and more moving than any drama. They are the biggest attraction of this film. I can totally understand the reason why Chen Zhen was fascinated by wolves at the beginning of the film (although he acted inexplicably, but I got it...). I feel that the director used all his strength when facing the wolves, and the close-ups of their beautiful eyes hit my heart, making me so sure that they are smart, witty, humane, and have a life of bohemian love for nature. The little wolf's display is different from that of the wild wolf. The few obediences on it can move people's hearts. Although we have always known that it belongs to nature, we fully understand the feeling of wanting to embrace it (I want to complain here, you Looking at the body shape of the little wolf is white and fat, and it is different from the wild skinny, which shows that the director is still body-conscious~). Wolf is the only actor in this movie. They are so beautiful. In short, I only have wolves left in my mind as I write this. It seems that I forgot to write it, and I don't want to write it anymore...Let me only have the wolf in my heart... Finally, please kneel down and ask everyone, if you have money, don't watch running men or something. There are so many people who make movies with their hearts, please understand The audience decides the market... I really can't tell which movie is the best movie for the whole family to watch "Bear Infested" (no matter what the story is, at least I really want to make a movie for the audience to watch, as a domestic animated movie, it is still remarkable) , really please...
View more about Wolf Totem reviews
