Please use the most vicious language to scold

Constantin 2022-04-20 09:02:30

Our family of three just returned from the movie theater. The father at the bottom of the family who played the role was lamenting the greatness of the wolf, while my mother and I were in the back row of the car because of the chaos of the movie and the mistake of choosing seats. So I said I was going to give this movie a bad review, and my mother said, please use the most vicious language to scold this movie.

Whether a movie is a comfortable place for people to watch, the first is the angle from which the movie is narrated. And this movie is a very SB person. He doesn't know that he is a SB. He regards himself as the Tengger of the grassland, and tries hard to make everyone around him imply that he is the hero of Tengger, who sees the grassland and the wolf in his eyes. s story. (I won't comment because I haven't read the original work.)

The one with the strongest favorability in the whole film is the little wolf. No matter how much the male protagonist pleases him and makes himself a slave, it cannot change the little wolf's contempt for the male protagonist.

If the chief does not have tolerance for the male protagonist, add one point, and if the chief does not imply that the male protagonist has kept the blood of the wolf at the end, add another point.

If Gasmic didn't reconcile with the hero in the end, add a point.

If the villain bag does not indicate that what the male protagonist says is what he says, add one point.

If the base friend did not help her boyfriend to protect the wolf, add one point.

But these plots exist, and they are all very illogical. The chief has been emphasizing the importance of Tengger and not destroying the ecological balance. If this point of view can be used throughout, it will make the movie more sublime. The blood of the wolf, but this behavior is what he has always opposed before. Gasmai said on the front foot that he wanted to kill the hero's wolf, and it was okay to let the wolf go, but somehow reconciled with the hero. Not being with the male protagonist is because the male protagonist will leave the grassland, but the male protagonist will leave after reconciliation, which is very contradictory. Jiyou obviously has very different ideas. He is more like an educated youth who doesn't eat human fireworks, but he is much more reliable than the male protagonist when he does things. In the film, he has always been the image of serving the male protagonist appear. The original image of the villain Bao is that he does not understand nature, so he does a lot of unnatural things, and there is no absolute right or wrong, but in order to set off the herdsmen, he is also a very serious character.

There are often some barrages in the mind in movies. For example, if XXXX is a masterpiece at this time, it is actually because the real plot is full of too many far-fetched, clichéd and fabricated for the sake of fabrication.

All the plots, all the character settings expressed in the wolf totem are serving the male protagonist.

Let's talk about the character characteristics of the male protagonist, whether it is really worthy of the role of

the Holy Father, obviously not.

After finding the little wolf, he did not discourage the poacher from throwing the wolf to his death, but he blamed his friend after he fell to his death.

Bringing the little wolf home, without considering the safety of the sheep, the safety of the children. When I let the children take care of the little wolf, I was very worried about what to do if the wolf was recruited to take away the children at this time, but fortunately, only another group of bear children came.

After seeing the person he likes angry, even if he is willing to exchange the wolf heart and kidney, but when he returns to his yurt, there will be no following.

When I was in the grassland, I said that I only lived here. This kind of mentality of living elsewhere makes people who have lived in such a place can only sneer.

To sum up, the quality of this film may be considered excellent in the Spring Festival films, but there are too many points in the plot that cannot be scrutinized.

The same is true for shooting, this Mary Sue's orientation is also very uncomfortable in the use of 3D. In addition to the mosquito, the whole film does not feel the significance of 3D. Moreover, the director should take into account the huge difference between the look and feel of 3D and 2D. When framing a scene in 3D, rapid lens transitions should be minimized so that the audience will not feel dizzy in such an environment.

After watching the video, my mother and I ate nearly a pound of iced strawberries and two bottles of soda to relieve the dizziness and nausea caused by the 3D movie, and I still can't control the urge to scold the male protagonist SB. .

View more about Wolf Totem reviews