If you can measure things in terms of imagined experiences, I'd say watching an old restored movie is better than smoking weed. Amway's "Chivalrous Girl", there is a restored version at station b. There is really no negotiation between clothing and composition. After looking at everyone's face with smoky makeup for a long time, you can really feel the beauty. Hitchcock's suspenseful atmosphere, with a strong sense of substitution. There are few lines, no trouble, the characters stand by their expressions and actions, and the clever film language skills make people's attention all focus on the externalized images. Xu Feng's indifferent face is so advanced that it makes people want to go crazy. The female protagonist from the perspective of a male director always makes me curious (you can only be curious if you don't have to question at a young age). The same goes for "Chivalrous Girl" and "Assassin Nie Yinniang", there are always women's soft-hearted emotions flowing out in the murder plot. During the fight, the chivalrous girl suddenly stopped the knife because the other party said something begging for mercy. Nie Yinniang didn't kill the person holding the child and Zhang Zhen, was it out of morality or just a soft-hearted whim. Suddenly made me question. The female killer from the perspective of the male director, even though her face is cold and beheaded like a haircut, she will still subconsciously show a tender side in a certain situation. Maybe it's because I haven't noticed and realized the truth of "men are rational animals, women are emotional animals". Or I subjectively substitute the stereotyped image of the male director to speculate. do not know. But it's really unpleasant. After dawn, the scholars saw that there were corpses everywhere in the East Factory. The psychological activity was panic. One second, they were ecstatic about the smooth implementation of the plan, and the next second was a wave because of the fact that people like me all died. The huge psychological impact brought by him, but he never showed the pitiful imagination of whether these people should kill or not. The male perspective is the externalization of logical psychological activities, and the female perspective is the unreasonable behavior caused by psychological and emotional fluctuations. This comparison is my intentional villainy, I also recognize it. Another wonderful thing is that as soon as I watched it, I immediately thought that this was a Buddhist propaganda film. I was struck by the mysteries of the Buddha every minute. The Buddha lies in stopping killing, the Buddha lies in emptiness, and the Buddha lies in neither good nor evil. Killing and killing people is not just a group of bad people who are good people and bad people. How stupid. It's still my Buddha's compassion, and it's a human being. Then I felt that what I was thinking was too stupid, this is basically a low Buddha. At the end, the Buddha crossed the wicked and was harmed by the wicked. After that, the wounds flowed out of golden water, and sitting on the ground was like Nirvana. In my naive thinking, I always felt that the Buddha was using a detached attitude to despise all beings in heaven and earth. It's like "I won't accompany you to play with people who are vulgar and evil." The equality of all beings is not that everyone's life is equal, but that everyone's life is equally worthless. If there really exists a Buddha, I think cruelly, it will not help people. Harmful people will only silently watch people suffer the karma themselves, that kind of compassion just thinks you are bored. Only human beings can do such things as using violence to control violence and punish evil and promote good. Doing well is a hero.
View more about A Touch of Zen reviews
