Movies, people who have seen them will say that the time is too short to be fully narrated, so the problem of the movie is not my focus.
Engels Quote: Are the proletariat and the bourgeoisie brothers? No, it's the enemy! That's the point!
So, the bourgeoisie is under dictatorship. You are the bourgeoisie, what should you do? Is it bad to engage in nothingness of history and delete the legitimacy of your own history? We must respect ourselves and Marxism at the same time, and we must also respect the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. These two things are diametrically opposed, eliminating exploitation means eliminating profit, and opposing everything for profit. What should we do? Castration slightly, certainly not castration profit. Take Mao Zedong Thought, for example, leaving the practice of New Democracy and deleting the practice of proletarian revolution. In this way, it not only fully affirmed Mao Zdong's achievements, but also gave himself historical legitimacy, and at the same time, he could enjoy the fruits of surplus value. Let the phantom of Marxist Mao Zedong Thought hang over the working class and ensure the smooth realization of surplus value. This method is really good!
The problem is, of course, the law of universal connection of all things works. Profits will affect everyone. Some people eat meat, some people drink soup, and some people are contributing meat. No one provides meat sources. Therefore, there are at least three types of people in this society, and there must be three attitudes towards profit and Marxism. You are a dictatorship, and you are sure that the above-mentioned approach is the most rational. You are the kind of person who drinks soup in the middle. This is a bit of a dilemma. If you have more meat, you should follow the soup. Of course, the more meat, the better. The problem is, if there is not much meat, it is not easy to drink soup. Become the person who donates meat.
Here comes the point of the question, you are the one who contributes the meat. The blind man touching the elephant tells us that we see things differently from different angles, so, of course, when it comes to meat, people who eat meat say that the more the better, and the people who contribute meat, the more the better or the less the better, or not Is it better to be cut? Marx's purpose is very clear, to eliminate the existence of meat! The attitude towards meat, the attitude of eating meat and the attitude of contributing meat are diametrically opposed, which leads to a series of other oppositions, comprehensive oppositions. Do you think like a meat eater? The ideology of those who donate meat and those who eat meat is completely opposed to each other. This is the manifesto of the Communist Party. The theory is ready, the rest is just how to practice.
The point is, as someone who contributes meat, what do you do? This should be the problem of most people! Use humanitarianism, tears, kindness, kindness against the enemy? Do you need to be concerned that the slaughterhouse is not running smoothly? Do you need to care about black and white people eating your meat? Do you need compassion? What is your purpose and method? Understand this, this movie is not in vain.
Marxism is not an abstract doctrine, but a real guiding principle of practice. You are the one who contributes the flesh. This is your weapon, the critique of the critique of the critique!
View more about The Young Karl Marx reviews
