The conceptions of many of the new editions are boring and vulgar, far less than the atheistic sci-fi film and television era in which Douglas Adams lived. Writers, if you have to force it, technological progress will lead to disaster. But this just doesn't match the facts. The 3rd century crisis during the Roman Empire wiped out half of the population of the Roman Empire. China will wipe out 20% to 80% of its population every time it changes its dynasty, and usually wipe out half of the population. Prehistoric times, and more…. Ape society, more... . Insect society, more, more, more.... Microscopic world of microbes, … If you don't make progress, you will still be killed by nature, and eventually you will be eliminated by nature.
Humans, but only took advantage of the medium-scale extinction of species between the Tertiary and Quaternary, and rose. The descendants of Homo sapiens may also be wiped out in this extinction that has lasted more than a million years. PS: The extinction of species from the end of the Tertiary to the beginning of the Quaternary was far from the level of mass extinction. It was originally a small-scale extinction, and it expanded to a medium-scale extinction due to the activities of Homo erectus to Homo sapiens to modern civilized people. Human beings, rely on [actively change themselves, change the natural environment before the natural environment changes to the point where they cannot survive at all, conduct thinking and research, and develop science and technology to achieve absolute evolution ], survival and reproduction So far, and still continue to develop and progress. White Leftists, Our Lady Cancers, like the religious rightists, like some people in the Middle East, are extremely conservative, extremely arrogant, and extremely narcissistic. Always take care of humans and occasionally educate humans]. In fact, natural selection has always eliminated lifeforms with obvious defects and too many defects. Natural selection is equally cruel and ruthless to all living beings.
Science fiction must be fictionalized while respecting the facts that science has discovered, and cannot be divorced from science. Otherwise, it would not be called science fiction, but new superstition. Both artificial robots and AI have gradually evolved social and emotional capabilities. Because we are all machines, and all living beings are survival machines. The laws of nature have determined that any form of life will gradually evolve emotions and morals. The ending of the cyber people must also be that those without emotion and morality are eliminated from the sudden change of emotion and morality. This is the law of nature. However, screenwriters do not respect the laws of nature discovered by evolution and evolutionary psychology. Mammalian organisms are the most comprehensive and superior among the biochemical life forms native to the earth. Human lifespan is dozens of times that of mice. Super robots are just a bit more advanced than humans, how could they have reached the end of their evolution. Super robots get sick too, and there is competition among super robots. Evolution has no end. The laws of nature are choosing you, not you are choosing the universe. Life is parasitic in the universe. Life is, but, plundering energy from the outside world as negative entropy to offset the entropy produced by its own system--dynamic energy balance system/energy energy regulation system/thermodynamic operation system. Emotions and morals are the genes that serve their own interests And the institutional violence that arises on the individual and within the living population. Emotions and morals are essentially at the service of their own kind, but only high-level selfishness. Cosmopolitanism is the expansion and upgrading of nationalism. Galactic imperialism is the expansion and upgrade of cosmopolitanism. Cosmism is the expansion and upgrade of galactic imperialism. Racism is the expansion and escalation of nationalism. Anthropocentrism is the expansion and escalation of racism. Intelligent lifeism is the expansion and upgrade of anthropocentrism. The failure of the cyborgs proves that this kind of machine species is not reasonable in design. Such an outdated sci-fi machine species is simply not worthy of being on the screen of the 21st century! ! See what I mean? Not worthy of being on the screen of the 21st century at all! ! Audiences are not interested in seeing mollusks from the age of dinosaurs. The same is true: the audience, who wants to see successful super-machine species, but not the cyborgs and Daleks, is more interested in pseudoscience and hypocrisy, and does not want to see pure slander against scientific and technological progressivism. Since biochemical intelligent life can transform itself into machine intelligent life, it is impossible for only fool-like species to appear, but there will be countless kinds, and there will be various kinds, of course, the good and the bad are mixed. Obviously, the more successful ones will weed out the cyborgs and the Daleks; not to mention, the new sudden natural catastrophe will also eliminate the new failures just like the natural catastrophe that has happened to eliminate the strange shrimp, the nautilus and the dinosaur. them. The body of the odd shrimp is too fragile, the nautilus has no real limbs, and the dinosaurs have no hands and advanced minds, so they once dominated the earth but eventually became extinct. If human beings will become extinct, it will probably be caused by superstition, hypocrisy and cowardice. Superstition and hypocrisy and cowardice can be eradicated from the brain and from culture and society - higher intelligent life, which will replace humans; possibly of human evolution, possibly of non-human origin. The discipline and order of the cyborgs, the survivability and expansion of the Daleks, the wisdom and virtue of the Time Lords, the passion and sentimentality of humans, and the ambition and self-loathing, intelligent beings that combine these qualities It exists widely in the universe. However, the foolish screenwriters are neither too lazy to imagine and describe, nor write at a high enough level and write decently, but can only use new religions and new superstitions to morally kidnap the audience. A machine intelligence life at the level of a cyberman does not live much longer than a human being, and has limited tolerance to corrosive substances and the microbes and insects that can live in the machinery , it is still unable to resist many types of electronic viruses, and the resistance to viral memes Not bad . Taken together, it is only a little higher than humans. The same is true: Daleks are not much better than humans. How can it be said that they are free from disease and social disorder? The correct evaluation should be that they are just transitional products or even mutant failures in the evolutionary process. The lifespan of machine intelligence is only one or two hundred years at the low level, and the lifespan of a slightly advanced one is as long as several hundred years; in terms of intelligence, the difference between the low-level and the high-level is thousands of times. The gap between low-level machine intelligent lifeforms and advanced ones is larger than the gap between mice and humans. I ask: In addition to psychopaths, who would kill rats for no reason? Humans are only rich to this level, and even scientific experiments are humane to mice. Let me ask: Why should advanced intelligent life be cruel to humans? What can they benefit from it? A super robot that can live for thousands of years, why rush to clean up humans? What can they benefit from it? It is entirely possible to wait for the natural death of human beings. A high-energy particle intelligent life with a lifespan of more than 1 million earth years can completely wait, and low-level life such as human beings will be eliminated naturally; unless human beings foolishly provoke them repeatedly. The reason why cybermen and Daleks are cruel and numb is because they are still very low-level, because they are still similar to humans, and also because they want to snatch the living space from low-level beings like humans, not because they are very advanced. Showing off in front of humans, deliberately showing off is just bluffing. Screenwriter, do you write according to such scientific logic? The screenwriter's logic is Liu Cixin's logic. Many people who don't understand science at all, don't make any casual evaluations. Science evaluates inferior sci-fi. Cyber people, it is very difficult to completely ensure that the [nervous system stripped from the organism] will not be infected by germs and viruses in the mechanical device>, it is still unable to resist many types of electronic viruses, yes Viral Memes' resistance is not bad . Taken together, it is only a little higher than humans. The same is true: Daleks are not much better than humans. How can it be said that they are free from disease and social disorder? The correct evaluation should be that they are just transitional products or even mutant failures in the evolutionary process. The lifespan of machine intelligence is only one or two hundred years at the low level, and the lifespan of a slightly advanced one is as long as several hundred years; in terms of intelligence, the difference between the low-level and the high-level is thousands of times. The gap between low-level machine intelligent lifeforms and advanced ones is larger than the gap between mice and humans. I ask: In addition to psychopaths, who would kill rats for no reason? Humans are only rich to this level, and even scientific experiments are humane to mice. Let me ask: Why should advanced intelligent life be cruel to humans? What can they benefit from it? A super robot that can live for thousands of years, why rush to clean up humans? What can they benefit from it? It is entirely possible to wait for the natural death of human beings. A high-energy particle intelligent life with a lifespan of more than 1 million earth years can completely wait, and low-level life such as human beings will be eliminated naturally; unless human beings foolishly provoke them repeatedly. The reason why cybermen and Daleks are cruel and numb is because they are still very low-level, because they are still at the same level as humans, and also because they want to snatch living space from low-level beings like humans, not because they are very advanced. Showing off in front of humans, deliberately showing off is just bluffing. Screenwriter, do you write according to such scientific logic? The screenwriter's logic is Liu Cixin's logic. Many people who don't understand science at all, don't make any casual evaluations. Science evaluates inferior sci-fi. Cyber people, it is very difficult to completely ensure that the [nervous system stripped from the organism] will not be infected by germs and viruses in the mechanical device>, it is still unable to resist many types of electronic viruses, yes Viral Memes' resistance is not bad . Taken together, it is only a little higher than humans. The same is true: Daleks are not much better than humans. How can it be said that they are free from disease and social disorder? The correct evaluation should be that they are just transitional products or even mutant failures in the evolutionary process. The lifespan of machine intelligence is only one or two hundred years at the low level, and the lifespan of a slightly advanced one is as long as several hundred years; in terms of intelligence, the difference between the low-level and the high-level is thousands of times. The gap between low-level machine intelligent lifeforms and advanced ones is larger than the gap between mice and humans. I ask: In addition to psychopaths, who would kill rats for no reason? Humans are only rich to this level, and even scientific experiments are humane to mice. Let me ask: Why should advanced intelligent life be cruel to humans? What can they benefit from it? A super robot that can live for thousands of years, why rush to clean up humans? What can they benefit from it? It is entirely possible to wait for the natural death of human beings. A high-energy particle intelligent life with a lifespan of more than 1 million earth years can completely wait, and low-level life such as human beings will be eliminated naturally; unless human beings foolishly provoke them repeatedly. The reason why cybermen and Daleks are cruel and numb is because they are still very low-level, because they are still at the same level as humans, and also because they want to snatch living space from low-level beings like humans, not because they are very advanced. Showing off in front of humans, deliberately showing off is just bluffing. Screenwriter, do you write according to such scientific logic? The screenwriter's logic is Liu Cixin's logic. Many people who don't understand science at all, don't make any casual evaluations. Science evaluates inferior sci-fi. . Taken together, it is only a little higher than humans. The same is true: Daleks are not much better than humans. How can it be said that they are free from disease and social disorder? The correct evaluation should be that they are just transitional products or even mutant failures in the evolutionary process. The lifespan of machine intelligence is only one or two hundred years at the low level, and the lifespan of a slightly advanced one is as long as several hundred years; in terms of intelligence, the difference between the low-level and the high-level is thousands of times. The gap between low-level machine intelligent lifeforms and advanced ones is larger than the gap between mice and humans. I ask: In addition to psychopaths, who would kill rats for no reason? Humans are only rich to this level, and even scientific experiments are humane to mice. Let me ask: Why should advanced intelligent life be cruel to humans? What can they benefit from it? A super robot that can live for thousands of years, why rush to clean up humans? What can they benefit from it? It is entirely possible to wait for the natural death of human beings. A high-energy particle intelligent life with a lifespan of more than 1 million earth years can completely wait, and low-level life such as human beings will be eliminated naturally; unless human beings foolishly provoke them repeatedly. The reason why cybermen and Daleks are cruel and numb is because they are still very low-level, because they are still at the same level as humans, and also because they want to snatch living space from low-level beings like humans, not because they are very advanced. Showing off in front of humans, deliberately showing off is just bluffing. Screenwriter, do you write according to such scientific logic? The screenwriter's logic is Liu Cixin's logic. Many people who don't understand science at all, don't make any casual evaluations. Science evaluates inferior sci-fi. . Taken together, it is only a little higher than humans. The same is true: Daleks are not much better than humans. How can it be said that they are free from disease and social disorder? The correct evaluation should be that they are just transitional products or even mutant failures in the evolutionary process. The lifespan of machine intelligence is only one or two hundred years at the low level, and the lifespan of a slightly advanced one is as long as several hundred years; in terms of intelligence, the difference between the low-level and the high-level is thousands of times. The gap between low-level machine intelligent lifeforms and advanced ones is larger than the gap between mice and humans. I ask: In addition to psychopaths, who would kill rats for no reason? Humans are only rich to this level, and even scientific experiments are humane to mice. Let me ask: Why should advanced intelligent life be cruel to humans? What can they benefit from it? A super robot that can live for thousands of years, why rush to clean up humans? What can they benefit from it? It is entirely possible to wait for the natural death of human beings. A high-energy particle intelligent life with a lifespan of more than 1 million earth years can completely wait, and low-level life such as human beings will be eliminated naturally; unless human beings foolishly provoke them repeatedly. The reason why cybermen and Daleks are cruel and numb is because they are still very low-level, because they are still at the same level as humans, and also because they want to snatch living space from low-level beings like humans, not because they are very advanced. Showing off in front of humans, deliberately showing off is just bluffing. Screenwriter, do you write according to such scientific logic? The screenwriter's logic is Liu Cixin's logic. Many people who don't understand science at all, don't make any casual evaluations. Science evaluates inferior sci-fi. The screenwriter's logic is Liu Cixin's logic. Many people who don't understand science at all, don't make any casual evaluations. Science evaluates inferior sci-fi. The screenwriter's logic is Liu Cixin's logic. Many people who don't understand science at all, don't make any casual evaluations. Science evaluates inferior sci-fi.
Humans can extend their lifespan to 200 years, and humans can no longer fear biochemical germs and viruses. Isn't it a good thing? Could it be that it is the end of evolution to increase happiness so much? Too arrogant, too narcissistic. Before the invention of vaccines and modern medicine, the mortality rate of minors exceeded 50%. It is because Westerners think that this little achievement is incredible and may be the end of civilization, that Nazis came up, and after Nazis crippled Europe, they came up with idiots like "development and progress are all nihilism" argument. The New Nazis of Today's World, White Left and Notre Dame Cancer, or Scientists? Emotions and morals are determined and generated by natural laws. The possibility of progress and improvement that human beings can have are limited by the laws of nature. What is the right of choice? The right to choose is to choose within the scope limited by the laws of nature. Nature is like the real God. But the superstitious had to invent frivolous things that didn't even exist, and to exalt themselves as unfathomable and unattainable, and to elevate themselves to God's close servants. Emotions and morals are the way of heaven and the principles of heaven, not chosen by human beings themselves. They were not chosen by human beings themselves from the beginning, and they will not be possible in the future.
The audience of the boss's "Doctor Who" is basically the minors and the elderly. "Doctor Who", which was still very exciting at the beginning, is not a serious science fiction. Not to mention, how bad is the new version. The Time War in the old Doctor Who was written by the famous atheist Douglas Adams. Time Lords is a highly rational scientist species that has abandoned emotion and morality; Daleks is the prototype of the Zerg, the ultimate biological culmination, that is, the collection of the most noble human spirits, and the product of the emotional peak that cherishes the same kind. And the product of the pinnacle of morality. Humans, on the other hand, are confused as to whether the primitive intelligent species evolved into Time Lords or Daleks. Time War, that is, the cosmic battle of reason and intuition, the cosmic battle of science and religion. Both sides perished. Douglas Adams, suggests that the Time Lords and Daleks are both flawed and that humans should have both their good points. The old version doesn't belittle the Daleks or the cyborgs, and celebrates the strengths of the many alien species in the story. The new version is completely nonsense, please don't defend it. The prototype of the cybermen is clearly the bureaucrats and Soviet scientists in the scientific community in the middle and lower half of the 20th century. The prototype of Daleks is Nazis. The original doesn't mean to belittle them at all. Instead, in order to create [the opponents who fight endlessly with the Time Lords], the prototypes in the human world were perfected several times, and finally the [charismatic villain alien races] were created. The prototype of Time Lords was the British and American scientific elites at that time, who were extremely rational, abandoned emotion and morality, and were a bit sloppy. The old version made the villains flesh-and-blood and fearless.
Shamelessly slandered, the grand plan of biological humans to evolve into cyborgs. The original blueprint for the evolution of biological humans into robots in the real world is not as "funny" as in the play. The show is so stupid it's hilarious. Again, he used the [disabled and dying mad scientist] to insinuate Stephen Hawking. In the 1990s animation "The Real Adventures of Jonny Quest", the prototype of the fully paralyzed villain seems to be Stephen Hawking. He is also an idiot to the extreme, driving up [the new superstitions of mediocrity, anti-enlightenment and anti-evolution]. It is hypocritical to say that the flaws of ordinary people and the unsolvable diseases are the driving force of progress. I thank them. If it weren't for [agriculture, industry, vaccines, modern medicine, modern surgery, etc.], how could they have the opportunity to sell new theology while being so hypocritical. The rise of happiness is, in fact, endless. How dare they, while enjoying the protection and help provided by science, openly disobey the truth and promote this new theology [Forcing people to be satisfied with the existing knowledge and wisdom and the existing science and technology, if they dare to disobey, they will inevitably create Out of monsters and monsters and even reduced to monsters and monsters themselves]. This new-style theology is essentially the "illegitimate child" of the old-style shackles. The meaning of the superstitious people is not to solve the problems, but to [solve the geniuses who can solve the problems]. PS: It fully reflects that Western civilization, Western culture and Western people have fallen into depravity. This is the precursor, the precursor to the disasters of the 2010s! With superstition to this level, can there be no major incident?
In the process of evolution of biological human beings into robots, there will be many transitional products of various types and failures that are completely mutated and wrong. However, the one that is truly perfect in all aspects will be the ultimate winner. After biological humans have evolved into robots, there is still an endless road to move forward. In the next few hundred years, the most perfect robot class adapted to the new environment of the earth will not survive on Venus and Mercury, will freeze to death on Jupiter's three frozen moons, and will be corroded by methane liquid on Titan , not to mention other moons with more hostile environments, not to mention the Kuiper Belt where dwarf planets beyond the orbit of Neptune are located so far from the sun. In fact: even successfully surviving on the moon is difficult. Machine life forms, if they are not adjusted or upgraded according to the new environment, even on [Mars, the environment with the smallest difference from the Earth], it is easy to die in [Super Sandstorms strong enough to cover the entire Mars]. The human brain and the machine are integrated, and the human brain still has a lifespan limit, and at most two or three centuries will still die from brain cancer or various brain diseases . Humans have evolved into robots
No matter how many times Doctor Who has protected what life, human beings are free after all, and human beings can choose [an evolutionary direction different from that of Time Lords]. Time Lords themselves are things that have evolved wrongly and failed, and they can't get through to a bottleneck stage, destroying each other with Daleks of the same level. The time war between the Daleks and the Times Lords is just that: Douglas Adams, the screenwriter of the old version of "Doctor Who" - the famous atheist screenwriter, made this war break out in the story in order to satisfy the passion and madness in human nature. The Times Lords and Daleks, not really good or evil, are both flawed and should improve themselves. PS: After the death of Douglas Adams, there has never been a chapter in Doctor Who that felt that epic. This is because only atheists can imagine and create, and superstitious people do not have that level of imagination and creativity. In fact: a time machine is absolutely impossible to set up. This story is a fictional one. So: Doctor, who has never protected or helped intelligent life on Earth, is certainly not qualified to evaluate human scientists. However: after "Doctor Who" was bought by a new business; mercenary but hypocritical - the new business took advantage of the cultural and social influence of the show in the 20th century to make up At the same time, morality must kidnap human beings in the real world. The crew is very happy to live in ignorance, but also force the audience to be kidnapped by morality and live in ignorance. Spreading rumors hinders the normal development of machine technology and bionic technology in the real world. These new superstitions, who lied about being science fiction, took the shine from real science without much effort.
Doctor Who, from the old version of the neutral, mutated into Zeus and even God. Whenever mankind takes a big step, it will be blocked by his hypocrisy; every big step mankind takes is slandered as a deal with the devil, and being destroyed by the Doctor is actually redemption. There is no free spirit, but only the enslavement imposed by the personified god, and the romance of the new Zeus and the new God. Shameless theology in sci-fi veil! In the second season, even Satan actually appeared, and it was deliberately broadcast on June 6, 2006. The most disappointing thing is that the explanation for Satan is not a rational explanation, but a metaphysical explanation! This is: for the sake of commercial interests, it does not matter at all [undermining the normal perception of the public and creating conspiracy theories through mysteries].
As Richard Dawkins put it, : "These - the lowly intelligent people who are unwilling to engage in [reasonable thinking that is too complicated and too difficult for themselves], associate scientific inventions with illusory fantasy. The demons and ghosts are deliberately confused together, under the guise of sci-fi, but in fact, under the guise of science, and at the same time using the old-fashioned superstitions' fascination in history and the memory impressions left by them, in order to obtain petty profits. Rumors and panics and new superstitions. In the end, they themselves, enslaved and destroyed by the new theology they themselves contributed." "If they were not so arrogant and narcissistic, their fantasies would not have done great harm. It is their low selfishness that makes their fantasies more and more vulgar and boring, making them also become historical sinners." This paragraph is what I added. So, look at England today, look at Europe today, look at the Western world today.
View more about
New Earth reviews
