The first few posts said "the truth is intentionally vague" and what "the truth doesn't matter". What a fool. The director has already hinted the truth so clearly, but he doesn't understand it and criticizes it indiscriminately. The daughter finally told the lawyer that everyone was lying, wouldn't it be a lie? The defendant said that she did not kill anyone, but was lying. The lawyer asked her not to tell the scandal of being sexually assaulted by her father, and she also cooperated in lying.
What is the truth? The truth is, of course, that the defendant killed the father in order to save the daughter who was sexually assaulted. But the accused did not want the sexual assault scandal to be made public. For this reason, he kept telling lies to attract attention. But in the end, he found that the lawyer still learned about the father's sexual assault on his daughter, and knew that the daughter was going to testify about the sexual assault in court. In order to prevent the scandal from being exposed and preserve the girl's reputation, the defendant simply denied murder. Once denied the relationship, of course, there is no motive for the murder, and the daughter does not have to uncover the truth of the sexual assault.
The defendant would rather be sentenced to death than to have the girl's reputation ruined. After the lawyer understands the intention of the defendant, he is willing to lose the case and help him fulfill his wish. The duty of a lawyer is to fulfill the wishes of the defendant (what a self-sacrificing wish), although on the surface the defendant is disadvantaged, so the lawyer has a clear conscience.
View more about The Third Murder reviews
