In the film, apart from those brief conversations after the cloud and rain between the two, it is impossible to see that there is a deep emotional exchange between them, and more is to seek excitement for temporary pleasure, including in the map room, Various provocations in public places such as classrooms, etc.
For the teenager, what did he gain from it? In addition to the pleasure, he carried a heavy psychological burden and was troubled by this emotional entanglement that was not tolerated by the world. The female teacher controlled the boy step by step from the half-joking words after reading the contents of the note, to the arrangement when she went to get the map, etc. She never tried to understand the boy deeply, such as the relationship between their brothers, etc., but was completely squandering each other's youth, and her actions and love seemed to be irrelevant.
The husband of the female teacher is too useless, it is understandable that he did not break it, but he can still enjoy music and drink with the male protagonist calmly after breaking through? Maybe the director wants to use this to create the growth process of the young man's life, but this kind of plot arrangement seems far-fetched and unreasonable.
There are a few paragraphs that I don't understand. One is that the bomber was out of order, the fuel leaked on the school playground, and the students ignited. What does this paragraph mean? At the end of the film, what is the meaning of the action of the male protagonist who is late and takes the stage in front of the female teacher? Why did he later take away the dictionary altogether?
View more about Love Lessons reviews
