The reason is very simple:
1. Since the criminal has revealed his name and identity from the very beginning (although it is his father's), the person whose name the police spent so much time trying to find out has already died a few years ago And his son seems to be working on TV? The director of the National Police Agency has even printed out the photo, so why not confirm the identity of this person? Still clamoring and confronting this person on the phone, the death is indeed wrong.
2. A total of three times before and after the criminals put the explosive earphones on the anchor, the female anchor and the director of the police department. Why did no one find out? It's true that live broadcasts are generally chaotic, but it's not that difficult to check who is in charge of wearing headphones, and there is usually surveillance on the scene, you can see it just by looking at it, why isn't anyone checking it?
3. From the very beginning, the criminal called to the TV station and couldn't hang up the phone, so you could know that the criminal must be an insider, and the voice was so young, it was obviously a good guy, okay? How could he still be an uncle in his 50s? The male anchor's IQ is indeed worrying.
4. A little guy in a TV station can blow up a bridge and two office buildings by his own power (although he didn't detonate the TV station building in the end), how bad is the public security in South Korea?
The idea of the movie is good, but I think the plot can be set up to be more logical and stand up to scrutiny. You can't fool everyone's IQ just because it's a small cost. At the very least, it would be logical to pack the criminals into a group fighting, such as the descendants of the three workers who fell off the bridge.
View more about The Terror Live reviews
