The logic of the police is also very strange. At the beginning, in order to catch the prisoner as soon as possible, the victim needs to first identify the prisoner and describe the crime process. When it comes to trial, it is also necessary to identify the prisoner in order to obtain a slightly more fair verdict than if the prisoner was not identified. Is there a problem with South Korea's legal system? If the victim dies on the spot, will the prisoner never be able to arrest in the first place, and if the victim cannot testify in court, will all prisoners be given light sentences? Or am I just too excited after watching the movie right now, so insane, like that prisoner, saying things I shouldn't say? Such a beast is inferior, and there are still lawyers willing to defend him? Where has the humanity of this society gone? Am I kidnapping the legal profession with morality by saying this? Am I being too naive to look at things this way? Is it possible to accept crime to a certain extent after drinking alcohol? Is it acceptable to mildly accept other situations except driving not allowed? Can a prisoner be commuted if he is insane? Does it mean that the law does not consider all crimes under abnormal mental state to be considered for sentencing? Lawyers, in human society, as long as they are legal professions, there are no moral boundaries, right? Human nature and interests, as long as they are within the scope of the law, can they be prioritized under any circumstances? Does my IQ drop to zero when I say these words? Does it mean that as long as good people need protection, then everyone needs legal protection? So lawyers are needed to defend evil deeds.
View more about Hope reviews
