I think one of the great things about this film is the restraint of emotions

Calista 2022-04-21 09:03:26

I saw someone saying that this film did not stimulate emotions and did not achieve the common anger of people and gods. I think it is not that it was not shown, but that it was deliberately restrained, because neither morality nor legal principles can be the only absolute standard for judging things.
Obviously inclined to morality, rendering emotions will get more applause from the audience, but it is not conducive to thinking and understanding of the matter itself.
Relatively objective storytelling can attract more people's attention to children's safety. If the film is too strong, and the prisoner is judged with morality, the audience's attention may be sullen again, and finally kill this bastard, it's just him, damn it, it's good to die and follow the film The ending ends thinking about the story together.
This way of handling, the contradiction between morality and legal principles, will make people feel helpless, and only when there is helplessness can they think.

View more about Hope reviews