The story of the two versions of Superman 2 is really completely different, just like the parallel world. When did Louise discover Superman's identity? How did Louise test and discover it? How did the attitude that Louise discovered affect the story? It's all different. Although it was due to the midway change of directors and the dispute over the remuneration, it was really cool to see the development of the two versions of the parallel world. Several worlds can complement each other, and it is easier to see the true intentions of the characters through different situational designs.
In order to watch the little reporter change and Superman saves her, the first version of the female reporter jumped off the waterfall at tourist attractions, and the second version of the female reporter jumped directly to the newspaper office; the identity of the first version was exposed because it was okay to accidentally reach into the coals, and the second version An awesome female reporter shot Superman directly.
The first version of Superman, the great savior Superman who is compassionate for the world, loves a female reporter like a dog, abandons the great soul for love and becomes fragile. Human beings give up love and return to their duties. Heroes are just as tragic and magnificent as righteous and strong men. The second version of Superman, I just don’t want to serve mankind anymore, I just want to be happy for a while, can’t I love all mankind, don’t love Why is a person, so why?
In the first version, the male protagonist accidentally exposed his identity, lacking the entanglement of people's subjective choices, and the question of which step and how far a person will take to stop has been avoided, just like Hannibal's second season ending. Although Er informed Hannibal, the battle was over there. In fact, he did not give him a life-or-death choice as to which side to stand on. The plot kill had already helped him choose. The debunked Superman is a little upset and happy, let me take you to see my castle, and then take you to the castle for dinner, very smoothly.
In the second version, because Superman didn’t go wrong, Louise was unsuccessful in putting herself in danger several times. In order to prove that she was right, she shot Superman directly. In fact, she was very selfish. Although it was an empty bullet, Superman was very selfish. Not happy, he hugged his arms in a defensive posture and said, if you are wrong, Clark will die. Then I took it to Lonely Fortress and it was a little bit strange. I felt like I’m having trouble taking a look at it anyway, and then I was very irresponsible and went straight after dinner. Regardless of physique problems, I guess I’ll feel that after finishing the dinner. Quite cool, just ask dad I want a person’s happiness. I don’t always care about human beings. I’m enough. It’s not appropriate for Louise to say that you do it for me at this time. It does seem a bit passionate. Super also said it’s not for the sake of You, it’s for us. Dad made him think twice. He finally thought of the sentence I love her. It seemed a bit far-fetched and a bit irrational. It also conflicted with the first set of people who turned the earth affectionately for a female reporter. This superman was a bit angry. The first rural part of the young superman feels that he is always suffocating with dissatisfaction and wanting to roar. In fact, I really like the first version of the red sun room to remove the energy and leave a superman's phantom incapable of dropping his hands and standing back to back. The shot of an ordinary person shows Clark, a harmless, shy reporter, and the director’s version shows Clark, right? Superman in Clark’s clothes still feels very arrogant, dissatisfied that he is gone. Strength, so the hot dog shop encounters a dangerous hard anal. Compared to being sad that you can't protect your loved one, trying to stand up to protect her, it feels more like being angry that you look so useless, and you must want to prove something.
The superman of version one gave up power because he could not combine with close people and consulted methods in advance. This innocence really shocked me at the time. Others didn’t say whether to spend a lifetime with you, you gave up so much pressure on the little girl. ? But no way, Karl El is deeply in love and willing to give everything. The second version has no physical problems at all. Let’s talk about it first. It’s very American. Giving up power is an afterthought. I feel that walking, I want to live my own life. I want to retire if I don’t want to do it. I want to do it for myself. And live. He heard the old father’s teachings and knew this would happen. He chose to pretend to be deaf and dumb. He regretted that he saw something bad with his own eyes. However, if his mother didn’t tell him about it, he could choose completely for his love. After avoiding this kind of moral dilemma, the superman of version one still wants to continue to help mankind.
The original energy recovery comes and goes freely, without cost, and it is so convenient that it makes people feel that they can hit the red sun every time before snapping. The design is so easy because this super is to give up ability for love, once you see the world is threatened, as long as you make up your mind to give up love, you can express it clearly. In the director's version, Karl El really paid the price for a moment of selfish and selfish resignation, and lost his father. The cost is so high because Superman has to learn from the selfish thoughts with quotes that want to live like ordinary humans.
(Except for the different understandings of the two directors on Superman, it feels like Louise shot him very selfishly but absolutely effective at all costs to finally prove that he does not love humans so much, a kind of wonderful butterfly effect. The plots of the two films are interpreted together, and it is clear that the two single versions have many abrupt plots. To keep the characters pure, it really requires plot killing. It requires coincidences and important facts. He just doesn't know it. This is a fairy tale. If you really knew everything and nothing happened by chance, the humanity of Hong Guoguo would be revealed, and the director's version of the discussion would be more real and explicit.
View more about Superman II reviews
