The plot is compact and smooth, and the whole journey is pleasant for an hour and a half. Jgl was only 19 years old in 2002, his voice is so cute, right?
Read other film reviews, think of something, and write it by the way.
In fact, you don't need to watch the plot too rigidly. . No matter what point of view the movie conveys, I find it very interesting, unless the director and screenwriter are wavering and broken. I saw the comments saying that it was very uncomfortable for the hero to make things more troublesome, but whoever stipulated that 15-year-olds should be cute and obedient to abide by the rules. Let’s talk about the rules. They are also stipulated by specific groups of people under special circumstances. The application is flexible and flexible. Just like 996, although it is illegal, it is also an unspoken rule. You can choose to resign before being banned. It’s necessary to scold people who don’t follow the rules, isn’t it?
I saw the news today that the girl was scolded by passengers for taking pictures in the subway with a backless costume, criticizing her for not paying attention to the presence of children in the carriage. The subtext is that children live in a sexless world. Is the child really pure? If it's not pure, why can't you watch something that doesn't even constitute obscenity. If you are pure, does it mean you will never encounter sex? That is to say, is sex dirty? If it is dirty, why is the child born because the parents are dirty? If it is not dirty, how to define purity? At what point can it not be considered pure? Isn't this self-contradictory?
What's more, how can children understand the difference between protecting themselves and enjoying intimacy correctly if they are not given correct instruction? From another perspective, how can children not become sexual perpetrators?
Putting aside these things, the choice of sex belongs to the right of personality, and the "respect" of the personality itself is a basic principle. A child is like a blank piece of paper. If you tell him that you can criticize someone like this on the road, what's the difference between this and the humiliation of a slut at the same level? Even if you are not a slut, you can be insulted. "Because the tutor taught me this way, I can insult girls who I don't like." In a society where there is no respect, and in a society where people are not treated as human beings, how can people believe that they can get the dignity and the respect they deserve? Isn't this self-castration? Should girls feel ashamed if they wear less? Should boys be shorter and risk their death by sawing their bones for surgery? This is not feminism at all, it is just hope that everyone can get the dignity of being a human being. It can be different. You can choose yourself without being ridiculed for it. Have those who hurt others have never been hurt themselves? Are these injuries right? Or do they think that because they have been hurt, they have the right to hurt others?
The commentary said that insulting others in the name of educating the offspring is a hooliganism. Some people asked in turn: Would you let your children do this? I feel very puzzled. Playing hooliganism means interfering with other people's lives without a bottom line. The questioner is not arbitrarily misinterpreting other people's views and feels that he is morally justified, so why is he "plausible". Respect is not encouragement. Isn't an ideal society a society that allows everyone to choose their own path without interfering with others without being insulted? If I have a child, I hope that he can live a life like this, instead of being able to curse casually from my own psychology, and the other person must accept the world.
Speaking of the plot, according to the above point of view, Jimmy did not go to school when he was only 15 years old (obviously very smart). For some parents, it is not necessary to have electric shock treatment and to go to school, because the social rules are like this, "Teaching such a child makes me Shame", but his mother complained to the guests that she only wanted him to be happy. It can be said that it is television, it can be said that "in this way in modern society, people will always be grassroots." So, because I want the so-called emptiness of success, can I intervene in other people's lives at will? I think there are still two words in this world called “teach students in accordance with their aptitude” and “teach well”.
Respecting others as an individual requires admitting that the views you hold may be wrong. How much courage is needed. Those who admit their mistakes are truly brave.
View more about Treasure Planet reviews
