The Red Sea is a realistic war genre. The first thing is to portray reality, highlighting the cruelty, bloody, and shocking effects of weapons. This type of film should be compared with something like Saving Private Ryan.
The biggest personal complaint about the film is that there are various unrealistic embarrassments interspersed in the realistic atmosphere. This is particularly evident in realistic war films.
For example, when a signal soldier faced a group of rushing enemy troops and was in a very dangerous situation, I thought he could escape. After you came and went, he thought he could survive, and was suddenly hit by a living enemy. I think, this Very real and cruel, war is war, there is no protagonist halo.
Who knows then he moved and moved to connect the signal.
I'm out of the real world again. This is so cliché, a person was mortally wounded, where is this. As for what it looks like, refer to Saving Private Ryan, or the Revenant's Little Plum.
For another example, the battle and bloody scene before the death of the stone made me feel very impactful, it was really cruel, and when the female soldier went up to cry, I was in the scene again. This enemy hasn't finished fighting yet. You were still chug chug just now, and as soon as you turned your head, you hugged your teammates and cried, feeding you candy. . . Is this the case on the battlefield?
For another example, it can be seen that the director has put a lot of effort into the weapon effect. In order to make the visual effect picture better, he also added a scene of parachuting and gliding wings. Cool and cool.
But what's the point?
The camera is flying gorgeously in front of the camera, and in the next second the camera has sneaked into the middle of the enemy camp.
Need an airborne? How did you choose the drop-off location? How did you get into the local camp? without any explanation
I have seen many war movies with airborne scenes, but there are reasons for airborne, and basically there is a sneaking distance after airborne. Otherwise, it is a living target if it is too close. However, there is no excess in this film. The addition of this parachute jump is just to increase the viewing experience. What is the significance of such a visual effect? I feel embarrassed anyway.
There are many others. The captain has always responded very quickly in front of him, throwing grenades and carrying rocket launchers. This is very special forces, but also powerful and quick to respond. However, in the later stage, an old man can almost be said to take a gun and commit suicide. This is so slow to respond. Can you stop being realistic and need the plot?
Can you, an old man, take the gun of the special forces and commit suicide? Or in a state of high concentration. You're better off running than killing yourself with a gun.
I don't want to say more about hiding from helicopter firepower behind the car. If you want to be realistic, don't add such obvious distortion scenes.
Not to mention the sandstorm, it turns out that people just can't see things clearly in the sandstorm.
Cool is very cool, the visual effect is very shocking is very shocking. The weapon effect is very shocking!
However, the whole film gives me the feeling that it is incomplete in all aspects, realistic, not realistic to the end, some settings in the plot are very old-fashioned or even redundant, some plot lines have no sense of existence, and constantly add tasks to change tasks to promote popular scenes staged.
Anyway, there is no point in it that I can remember clearly.
View more about Operation Red Sea reviews
