I haven’t written a film review for a long time before the film review and I haven’t studied the military. When writing this film review, there will be a lot of military knowledge errors, logical confusion and poor writing. When he was a teenager who longed for the military and studied the military.
1. First of all, in terms of characters, the actors of Jiaolong in this film work very hard, but I still feel that they still lack the toughness and calmness of a soldier. Of course, it may also be the reason why the film is set for the first actual combat. I think Jiaolong's most domineering female soldier should be the female soldier. She has an explosive style, and her acting is very natural. The inch head is more realistic. After all, hair is a big burden on the battlefield. I don't think the captain's portrayal is particularly successful. First, the character is a little soft enough. Decisive, the second is that the tactical formulation is not complete, but it is not as good as the deputy captain on the battlefield. The villain terrorists are also very strong. They have marksmanship and tactics and are ruthless enough. The strongest villain is the one-eared juvenile soldier who is calm, calm and reflective to escape from the battlefield. This is also the one-eared juvenile soldier who is determined by SVD. This is also the society of juvenile soldiers that Lin Dao wants to express. The problem is, it is also shown in "Mekong River". Humans are inherently evil at the beginning, and handing guns to children will only make war more cruel, even beyond the understanding of adults. Because children, just thinking about how to win the game of war.
In general, some key characters are not well portrayed, but a few are more brilliant. 2. In terms of the plot, I just want to say that in reality, the commander will not fight a battle without intelligence and no support to do things outside the mission, nor will he bring irrelevant fighters. The purpose of saving more hostages and grabbing yellow cakes in the film is to highlight the humanitarian spirit of our country (with a political purpose - funny) 3. In terms of tactics, CQB is still quite good, and one scene that is impressive can be summed up in the whole article: When rescuing the consul, when fighting in the street, he refused to shoot, suppressed fire, pushed forward, and shot to death. But what makes me feel that the most unprofessional part of the film, the least special aspect of Jiaolong, is intelligence. On the battlefield, intelligence comes first, sometimes even more important than combat effectiveness, and there is no intelligence gathering scene in the film. If you are going to be crashed by a sandstorm, what about the investigation and attack? If reconnaissance support was provided earlier, the mortar positions would have been discovered earlier and there would have been no ambushes. There is also the sniper. The sniper is not only a fort, but also the eyes of the team. In the film, the sniper basically did not provide information to the team, which is too wasteful. There are also some pitfalls. At the beginning, the helicopter directly rides on the face and explodes. Are you not afraid that the pirates will suddenly appear and shake their hands and blow the hostage's head? 4. In terms of equipment, one of the highlights of this film is the equipment. According to the people in the circle, this is very tactical. Except for the initial amount of 95 and 88 (there seems to be a 05 punch?) It is more socialist, and other guns are too capitalist. Now, it's all NATO plus a variety of tactical sub-hangs. And when you sneaked in, the AK in your hand, the CTR butt, the Picatinny rail, the desert camouflage, and the inner red dot were completely different from other people's painting styles, so no one could recognize it? ! There is also the hood on the sniper scope, which is well received. T72 vs M60 is very interesting, I can only say that you can really grab tanks as vice-captain. Reactive armor blocking armor instead of steel pins is nice. In addition, the zip line when saving the embassy consul, I wonder if there is such equipment in reality? 5. In terms of reality, the bloody level of the domestic film Tear Devils (ah bah) has been changed. The description of the battlefield in this film is still relatively realistic. This is the war (said that the radio and energy passed the trial? Sure enough, the backstage is hard enough and nothing is a problem) It is bloody and cruel, and people hate war after watching it, and this achieves the correct purpose of war movies. The previous domestic war films blindly promoted blood, and also created a group of fifty cents who clamored for what to do every day. The real military fans are only addicted to tactical equipment and do not love war. It is not easy for the Chinese nation to achieve today's development. The blood of the martyrs is to water the soil of peace and tranquility, so that the people can live a stable life. Cherish peace and stay away from war. (Unless someone bullies him to the end, then he must do it and must kill him) There are still a few slots I found: 1. Is the SG551 high-power mirror really a good man to observe hand-to-street battles? I don’t know if I didn’t see the side sight of the machine sight or the gun feel and the natural muzzle pointing of the special warfare are really so good? 2. Is the captain's indoor RPG really not afraid of the tail flames killing himself and the reporter? 3. Although the close-range explosion power of mortars and artillery shells is much higher than that of previous war films, the degree of damage to people is still described as small. No one can explode at such a close range without being blown away by the air They are all shattered, and no one will be permanently deaf if you don’t wear earmuffs at a little distance (you obviously wear earmuffs, why don’t you wear them!) existing. Eh, I originally wanted to write a serious review of the film, but the more I wrote, the more I complained about it, more than to emmmm, maybe my style of painting is like this (•́ω•̀ ٥) Well, let's sum up Operation Red Sea is not like a wolf warrior. Personal heroism movies have become group-like movies, focusing on the description of the team. The plot is somewhat Hollywood cliché and some unprofessional, but within an acceptable range, the rest of the aspects also change the style of domestic war movies, the high speed of storytelling and bullet time. The slow motion is great and I like it very much. It has a qualitative leap in authenticity. Although the equipment and tactics are slightly flawed, they are generally more particular. The bloody human damage makes everyone feel the appearance of a real war. After all, it's a good thing that war is so cruel, otherwise some people will like it. —Robert Edward Lee
View more about Operation Red Sea reviews
