It has recently become an explosion, and I don't know when I can see it, so I will record it first. I don’t actually oppose the adaptation. The old version of the animation actually shaped the bear child in the original book into a beloved white lotus, and changed the spiritual core from “completely get rid of the shackles of traditional society such as filial piety, and realize the greatness of personal will. Freedom" was quietly replaced with the revolutionary spirit of "anti-feudalism, anti-monarchy, anti-bullying, and justice for the people". But this version even deleted the core plot of "cutting the flesh to return the father, deboning to return the mother", the image of the parents has been completely changed, and the pace is a bit big, almost equivalent to telling another story in the skin of Nezha . Such changes are probably aimed at weakening the film's "rebellion against patriarchy" connotation and making censorship easier, and at the bottom, it is probably aimed at making the middle-class parents who bring their children to watch the movie feel more comfortable when watching the movie The model couple in the film finds a sense of substitution. It should be said that the producers have also worked hard to achieve the best common divisor between the temple and the rivers and lakes, and the current box office results are fully deserved.
But what I really care about is the audience's strong reaction to the movie, which can be said to have stabbed a hole in the volcano, as if the movie was just an opportunity to cause the underground magma to erupt. This movie and the hit at the beginning of the year seem to have some echoes, which together reflect the general movie aesthetics of today's movie audiences and the turbulent public opinion below. I have seen similar arguments in more than one place, "Old filmmakers are outdated long ago, they only shoot the dark side and only reflect, and the bitterness and hatred are so annoying", "It's still young people who understand young people better." It seems that after years of deliberate cover-up and oblivion, the new generation who grew up in the era of economic take-off has long lost those outdated historical burdens, and they are also far from sufficient to criticize and reflect on history and culture. I have long lost that patience and appetite. What they want may be more of a cultural voice that matches the current economic status of the country, eager to establish a stronger and positive image, and the kind of "scalping up nine" that they have long been accustomed to in the general economic situation. The pleasure of thousands of miles. Based on this, their attitude towards traditional culture seems to be somewhat ambiguous, that is, they are not fully aware of its evils and have not really understood its beauty, and they are more inclined to acquiesce a priori based on the purpose of shaping their own image. For the sake of good, but in practice, the thief collages the things that really suit his own taste and thinks it is for my use, which can be regarded as a kind of "all history is contemporary history". However, "flowers are covered with brocade, and fire is cooked with oil". Perhaps in the rolling wave, it is normal for the sediment to sink and scum to rise. It is an extravagant hope to force some originals to clear the source. And what will really be left of our age in the end, we won't see until the tide recedes. It's for this.
View more about Ne Zha reviews
