I finally figured things out.

Eunice 2022-04-19 09:02:48

Before watching this film, I saw a comment that if you are a person who likes to watch exciting war scenes, you will think the first half of it is good, if you are a person who likes to watch literary films, you will think that the second half of it is good It's good-looking, and if you are a person who likes both scene effects and literary films, congratulations, you will think the whole film is pretty good. Fortunately, I seem to have joined the third group of people. Personally, I think this is the best so-called domestic blockbuster I've seen in the past few years. Not only the visuals and sound effects are well done, but more importantly, the story is well told and the actors acted well.
The battle scenes in "Assembly" have been accused by many people of learning from "Private Ryan", including the firepower configuration of the combat team, sign language, camera sense and even the appearance of being shot and spitting blood. To be honest, I also think that I have learned it. And I can also point out more, such as letting the scholar with glasses deliver the ammunition, just like a "Cubie", and finally stepping in the blood and dragging people is reminiscent of the beach in Omaha, the street fight at the beginning Many of the scenes in it are very similar to the small French town that Ryan guarded, and the enemy officer who charged with his brothers seems to be inspired by "Band of Brothers", but anyway, it should be said, learned Not bad, I didn't learn anything nondescript, and besides, the shooting technique of "The Great Soldier" was originally designed to show the real war scene, whether it is in the European battlefield or the Asian battlefield, as long as it is a battlefield, its environment is generally so similar. If the shooting method of "Big" is by far the most successful and most realistic way of expressing the cruelty of war, then I think it is a must to learn it. It must be much better than the aerial photography in "Three Battles". After all, it is more meaningful to restore the bloody brutality of war than to glorify it for political purposes. On the other hand, as a friend of mine said, if there was no blood in the previous paragraph, some people may not be able to truly appreciate the injustice and anger when Gu Zidi was interrogated again and again, and that he must correct the name of Jiulian. 's motivation.
The scene is a success, it's time to tell the story, "The Set" is also based on real events, Chinese screenwriters and directors are close to idiots in making up stories, but if you give them a ready-made story or book, it can still be done. patted. Whether it is Director Feng or Lao Mozi, the best films such as "Alive" and "Party A and Party B" are all adapted novels. This time Feng Xiaogang finally didn't play the "Night" set of fiction, but returned to reality to find such a real thing down to earth and talk about it. A lot of stories similar to the millet land were captured during the war, and the film also borrowed the words of a big pancake. The General Manager received hundreds of thousands of letters looking for troops. In every letter, there is a Gu Zidi and the soldiers of his Nine Company. What a vast group of people and their painful memories. Their stories may be very different, but I believe that there will be the same word in their hearts, that is "unfair", "the same goes out to fight, the same does not come back, why other people are martyrs, they are missing?" , not for the hundreds of kilograms of millet, but for such a name. In the end, the nine companies were proved, but there are more nine companies that cannot be proved. More soldiers who have been named by their parents can only sleep in the "unknown" with the name of "missing" on their backs. down the tombstone. Is this fair, not fair! Absolutely unfair, and more unfair! Think of those soldiers who were captured in bloody battles in the Battle of Jinshan and the Korean War, but were later released but were expelled from the party and the army by the motherland, and were labeled as "traitors" during the Cultural Revolution. Woolen cloth? I don't know when such a theme can be put on the screen. Maybe it's really only possible when this party falls.
Back to the movie, Feng Xiaogang was finally able to jump out of the shadow of a funny New Year's film this time, and told such a heavy and touching story well, and said it smoothly and thoroughly. There are laughter and tears in the film. Through the life of Guzidi, it also puts the era in front of us piece by piece. There is no grandstanding, only truth and true feelings. There are no bad people or bad people, only heavy history. If I want to sum up, I think the three sentences in the trailer are the most appropriate: our director, our warrior, our story!

Another: It may be that there are too many idiot-level movies, and some audiences of the corresponding level are used to it. When I watched this movie, there was a very sweet MM sitting in the back row, and while watching the movie, I was afraid that others would not know. She was talking loudly like ignorance, at first she wanted to slap her, but after hearing it, she just wanted to ask if she just came back from the sports meeting. The classic quotations are excerpted as follows:

At the beginning of the film, a subtitle is displayed on the screen: 1948 in the hinterland of central China. . .
MM came up with a sentence: Oh, it was something during the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression!

Shot: Gu Zidi collected a few helmets for the soldiers who were on the road. . .
MM said disdainfully: Oh, what's the use of the helmet, show it off!
Shot: A soldier was shot in the head. . .
MM proudly said: Look at the trouble, I said it, useless

footage: "Silly Root" was wounded and went to blow up the tank with a pack of explosives. . .
MM: Oh, this is a bomb thrower. Hey, where did that sniper go? Was he a sniper or was he throwing dynamite bags? .

The film has been out for a long time, and there has never been a female scene.
MM: Hey, how can the heroine not come out yet?
Shot: In the field hospital, the female nurse was explaining the situation of the millet land.
MM: The heroine, the heroine has come out! She is the heroine. . .
This nurse has not appeared in the mirror since then.
MM: How can the heroine just come out and disappear?

Shot: On the Korean battlefield, Gu and others put on the "Syngman Rhee" army uniform.
MM: Syngman Rhee? Who is Syngman Rhee, is he like "Chiang Jieshi"?

Footage: On the Korean battlefield, artillery blows up a bridge on a U.S. transport line a
few minutes later. . .
Shot: Guzidi came back from demobilization and passed by a bridge that appeared many times in the beginning of the battle. A subtitle appeared on the screen: In 1955, the old battlefield on the banks of the Fenhe River. . .
MM: Huh. . . Hasn't this bridge been blown up?
MM Boyfriend: It's stupid, but it's fixed again!

The last segment of the film reads: When migrant workers built a dam in 19**, they dug through the abandoned kiln and found 47 bodies. . .
MM: Oh, he finally dug it up!

View more about Ji jie hao reviews

Extended Reading
  • Miles 2022-03-18 09:01:08

    Samsung: What is missing, the tension is still insufficient. Compared with previous war movies on the mainland, the scenes are better, and the characters are more realistic and plump. But there is no reflection on the breakthrough of the war, especially for this civil war. Of course, this must take into account film control. I just thought, how did the descendants of the national army and the descendants of the communist army feel when they watched these kinds of movies together? Feng Xiaogang did not describe the national army positively, which is worth thinking about.

  • Anibal 2022-03-19 09:01:09

    I'm very pleased that I haven't heard "This is my last month's party dues" in the war movie. move.