A movie that makes you think twice. The film closely revolves around the kidnapping of a young girl, and uses the "time and space exchange" method to connect two perfect crimes with "same methods", which also reflects the contradiction between the statute of limitations (efficiency) of criminal prosecution and substantive justice. Personally, there are three points worth thinking about: 1. Details: The director set up many details in the movie, and it is these details that connect the "second crime" 15 years later. "Accidentally Played Recordings", "Car Logo", "Umbrella", "The Same Rainy Day", "Broken Tape Player", "Takeaway Brother"... The details left by these movies build the whole case Detective clues. 2. "Time and space exchange": The movie does not show the plot according to the time logic, but starts from different characters. The ingenious exchange between 15 years ago and now is the driving force. While conveying vague information to the audience, it is the answer to the following mystery. The announcement leaves room for surprise. 3. Character analysis: The film narrates the victim's situation, the perpetrator's motive, and the investigator's heart. One is a tortured mother who chooses revenge, the other is a criminal who chooses to commit a crime to save her daughter and always avoids it, and the other is a Investigators who persisted in cracking the perfect crime... which lends narrative legitimacy to the story. 4. Legal analysis: In fact, this film is mixed with a lot of knowledge of criminal law and criminal procedure law. For example, when the male protagonist directly picks up the white flower left by the murderer with his hands, the physical evidence has been contaminated... In addition to this, the statute of limitations for prosecution Is the system really reasonable? Is there a match between the legal truth and the factual truth? How should we view private relief in desperation? These are still questions worth reflecting on.
View more about Montage reviews
