1. Victims and perpetrators? Is this really possible? The validity period of 15 years, can 15 years wash away one's sins? A bouquet of flowers is just for the comfort of one's own soul. But is it really okay to bring everything back to "normal" through artificial means? But how can it be otherwise? Just like Ingmar Bergman, when there is no way, can man really punish sin on behalf of God? 2. Can you really give up everything for what you love? People are all selfish, and love can only be selfish. In order to save their own children, they harm other people's children. Is this "love"? I think this can only be regarded as selfish love. The reason why people are people is that they are inherently good, and they should never harm others for themselves. 3. Have all the people in the film changed? It seems that everything has returned to "normal", but I think everything has changed. The male protagonist Wu Qinghao was loyal to his identity as a policeman from the beginning, and finally compromised with "false evidence". way to become the perpetrator. Is it right to compromise with society and with the self? Fourth, from the perspective of film production, the plot is really NB. Although you may have guessed who it is, you will never be able to see through the plot. The reversed plot NB, the story is full of meaning and thinking, the only one who is not used to watching it is the female Lord's eyelashes. (I am obsessed with the plot, and the audiovisual may have less attention, but I have learned some simple shooting techniques for character movement)
View more about Montage reviews
