Finished it in two days

Trudie 2022-04-19 09:02:44

It's grand, and it's awesome!

Soviet film and television productions have a distinctly different temperament from Hollywood productions. I haven't read the original book yet, but I have already heard of the famous name of Russian literature.

Bringing a famous novel to the screen has always been difficult. If it succeeds, that is the classic of "Gone with the Wind", and if it fails, it is the end of "Base". Movies have a completely different way of telling stories than words. Speaking of "Gone with the Wind", it is a single protagonist and a single line from beginning to end. Personally, I think it is relatively easy to shoot, and the difficulty of group portraits with social and historical background has more than doubled.

Personal feelings about the main story of war and peace are the group portraits led by the three protagonists. In the context of historical wars, the content of the story itself is very complicated. To be able to move from textual expression to screen display, it requires precise grasp and appropriate trade-offs. Not to mention the subjective perspective and psychological description monologue of the original work. So you can see the difference from the current movie, there are a lot of character narration and subjective shots, showing the psychological state of the characters. It was a little uncomfortable at first, but just take a look. The director's shot language level is very high, every frame is as beautiful as a classical oil painting, and many montage techniques are very suitable for showing characters or battlefields. Of course, the most laudable is the war scene. In the era of no special effects, the grand war scene was restored with real scenes. Just thinking about the complexity of the shooting schedule makes me feel guilty and suffocated, and the director is still the male protagonist. How big is this? workload!

In addition, for such a masterpiece, such a movie is already the ultimate, but I can also feel that some parts are progressing too fast, so I still plan to read the original book.

View more about War and Peace reviews

Extended Reading
  • Flo 2022-04-22 07:01:49

    I really don't understand this film well. I slept four times in more than seven hours... The picture is really beautiful, the war and dance scenes are very atmospheric, but the empty scene of a lot of stream of consciousness makes me a little crazy, I am most impressed The shot is Andre's dead tree. Character dialogue is minimal, and storytelling with lots of narration and voiceover is my least favorite type of movie. The editing of many scene transitions is messy and blunt, and the soundtrack photos are interspersed, which is really strange.

  • Theodore 2022-04-23 07:04:08

    Romantic and elegant, a masterpiece, in addition to Andre becoming a supporting role, the director himself played Pierre as the protagonist, which is unhappy. The understanding of war may be pinned on a lot of hatred for Hitler. After all, history repeats itself. If Tolstoy catches up with World War II, I don’t know what will happen. The understanding of peaceful life deserves much consideration today. The first person in many novels is usually the bystander, the witness, the one who survives, whose personality is less attractive (extreme, dramatic) than the protagonist

War and Peace quotes

  • Narrator: In June 1807, in Tilsit, Emperor Alexander met with Napoleon. Meanwhile, life - real life as lived by people with its essential interests of health and sickness, toil and rest, and its intellectual interests in science, poetry, music, with its love, passions, friendship and hatred - went on as usual regardless of whether political relations with Bonaparte were hostile or not.

  • Natasha Rostova: Stop laughing. You're shaking the bed. You're awfully like me, just such a another giggler!