Someone wished my little one was violent and asked me to re-edit, no problem. Apparently the movie did a good job.
This article discusses whether serious realistic themes are suitable for commercialization attempts in emotional rendering.
The creative background is: while many opinion leaders lead the direction of public opinion, a movie lover is struggling to resist. There are thousands of articles, most of which are self-empowerment and capital-empowerment wrapped in high-level language materials. For a whole year, I haven't seen any movies worthy of artistic discussion released in theaters. Last year's "Dog Thirteen" and "Over the Spring" of the same type are probably more real than this "Youth of You". But such a movie, wrapped in traffic and capital, obscures the eyes of the public. It's really none of my business, and it's hypocritical again. In fact, there is a director's skill, I know it well, but it is precisely this kind of director's creative perspective that contrasts sharply with the director's skill. I don't know whether the creative team is conscious or unconscious, and either is worth vigilance. What about academia? He also wrote some innocuous articles, mostly based on "Zhongzheng" Confucianism, and neither side should be offended. What is a new attempt to combine commerciality and artistry? Of course, realistic themes can be handled commercially, and you’re done. Can you say that Iron Man does not reflect the youth culture behind the United States? Can't. But what the hell is it under the banner of a realistic theme? Kids, adults pay attention, and then what? Trapped in a fantasy of love redemption? As for the copyright issue, I think Rong Stem is secondary, and it can only explain the aesthetic issues of the creative team. You can choose a second-rate novel to be adapted into a first-rate script, but if you choose a seventh- or eight-rate novel to be adapted into a second- or third-rate script, should I sympathize with you?
If you can't read it, read the text in parentheses: Your idol is awesome, handsome, cute, I mean it. But this article does not welcome you. I have the right to express myself, and of course you also have it, turn right when you go out. )
———————————————
Let me first say that Director Zeng's way of portraying his characters is very romantic.
What is romanticism? An important spiritual turning point in the history of Western culture, what we advocate is to open up your emotions and drown you like a torrent. For example, Rousseau knows it, the one who wrote the Confessions. Rousseau often said, "Only I know myself, others don't." Does it sound handsome or not, a domineering young man in adolescence.
What is the truth? When he was poor, he went to a friend (Hume)'s house. Hume was very kind to him, but he felt that there was something wrong with him.
This is the essence of Western Romanticism.
And what does realism mean? A typical character in a typical environment focuses on hiding your tendencies, which is simply your restraint.
So first-rate movies hide their forms in reality, second-rate movies show off their emotions, and third-rate movies use realistic themes to show off their emotions. This is opportunistic, disgusting.
In my eyes, this movie doesn't even have a complete form of creativity, don't talk to me about close-up and hand-held, I dogma95 don't even recognize me, I recognize you?
But to be honest, this movie is not a bad movie. Except for the poor script, other aspects are barely qualified. But being wrapped in traffic to obscure something is your fault. I can bear with proper announcements. What the hell is going against Guling Street?
Nationalist populism is not scary, what is scary is that it is used by capital.
Okay, enough bullshit. Most people watch this movie and then look at the high and scary reviews. The first reaction is that they are at a loss, and then they think that "school violence" is a realistic theme. This film is touching and reflects real problems. How great! is good huh?
You've been tricked. Isn't teasing your emotions just to cover up the truth? You're done crying, don't you think you can give praise?
Directors and screenwriters have managed to stir up at least three levels of emotions in you:
One is pain, which is reflected in the ruthless exploitation and deification of Zhou Dongyu's character to arouse empathy. It is reflected in the more realistic but colder tones and the progressive dynamic sense of the upper layers of the editing to emphasize the bullying of Chen Nian. To arouse your pity by rolling down the stairs and hurting the heart of the ripped clothes. During the college entrance examination, I did not hesitate to design several interrogation sessions and add a pregnant policeman who hates for no reason to make you care whether she will take the test. Good (suspense).
The second is love. The street gangsters are shaped by heroism. They are handsome, cute, domineering and tough. Who doesn't love it? But, director, are you really not afraid that shaping the main character of campus violence into a hero will aggravate the possibility of campus violence itself?
The third is hate. From the beginning to the end, Wei Lai, a rich girl, had insufficient motivation. I was inexplicably afraid of the tough turning point of calling the police, and I was also drunk. If according to the director's logic, Chen Nianxiaobei is a teenager, but Wei Lai is not a teenager? What's more, she's still a girl who can go to Peking University? Oh no, two.
We should really pay attention to school violence, but how many people have noticed where the serious school violence spread on the Internet often occurs? In remote areas or villages or within the group of left-behind children, they are wearing dirty school uniforms and slippers and attacking each other fiercely. It's not that there are no cities, not Beijing and Shanghai, but the relative probability is much better. Why?
If you really care about school violence, take a walk on the mainland and take a look.
View more about Better Days reviews
