The fact is that all the males in the film are obsessed with Ghana, and even those who think they shouldn't be obsessed with him try to fake Kondo's order because they hate their infatuation. Everyone is in the fog of the Alliance of Chrysanthemums. The person who loves him the most is the person who declares the most impossibility to love him and hates masculinity the most. Okita, who left in the fog, should be going to reunite with him. Telling gay stories in daisy-colored smoke is also denied. Movies are the heart of the unseen. The lines are the opposite of the character's true heart. In the end, it should be the answer to the big mystery. What cannot be guessed by the audience is designed by Okita. Build is that everyone likes him. Everyone who liked him died. It's all done by Okita. In a word, Garner joined the Shinsengumi for Okita. The two have a promise. Ghana lost, making Ghana's strength unnoticed. protect him. pity. Still, although the ending conforms to the imagery, and the basic elements of communication are complete, and the narrative information can be as secret as possible, it is still ignored because it is trapped in the image of cherry blossoms. if so. After knowing that he loves himself, and knowing that all the people who liked Ghana are dead, the people who are liked by Ghana will be even more miserable, so I decided to kill Ghana (I don't know if it's a real or fake killing, the screenwriter may write it like this, see I'm not sure about the missing characters. After all, there are a lot of things here that are completely different inside and out.) Then it's possible that Kondo, the person who likes him above, designed that everyone who came close to him would die. It may be that the screenwriter has deliberately weakened or adapted the original work. This adaptation not only tries to interpret the original work, but also seems to actively increase its ambiguity. It seems that everything is developed according to the original work, but it can still be seen in the filming method. In terms of the development of the film, it can be seen that the director is trying to break through, and he has injected multiple other possibilities that he hopes for in the unclear language, that is, how he wants to write, (but maybe my speculation is also in the director's trap) I have rights. , the audience also has the right to simply give you the opportunity to explain the meaning of the audience, more and more obscure and hazy. It's just that the semantics of the shooting method are unclear, and it seems that there are multiple stories. In the movie, Garner's murder is not obvious at all, it's very hazy. The method of tai chi is handed over to the audience, and the scream is real or unreal.
That shocking H-ah might be "I love Okita." So Okita knew it would be his own bane. So according to this logic, it may be Kondo who killed Yuzawa, Takeda, these people. After all, he smiled and wanted Garner to kill Tashiro. It may have been planned long ago, or it may be a temporary evil thought. We don't know, but it's also possible that the director deliberately made this too clear to protect the possible ambiguity of the story. leave it to the audience. Hijikata hates the liking of Ghana, who is intervening between himself and Kondo, and even hates himself and inevitably likes him. He can only describe it as a monster, cutting down trees to vent his inner twist. All in all, this is a shit show. All in all, it's complicated.
View more about Taboo reviews
