I really don’t like the little actors in this movie. They are not at all clever and agile from Macaulay in the first two movies. This kid always has a kind of pretending and mature acting in acting. It makes me feel embarrassed...
The parents, especially the mother, played the role carelessly and casually as if they were drawn from the next studio. The villain is not as stupid as the previous two, and looks more villainous, but relatively not as cute as the previous two villains.
In addition, as a sequel to this series, this film suddenly changed its style completely, which caused the film to be a little different from the beginning style. After reading the beginning, I also specifically determined whether the title of the next film was "little ghost". Home"...
All in all, the plot is okay. It inherits the essence of the first two plots but does not apply the framework of the first two, which is considered a breakthrough. But relatively, the plot depth is not enough, lacking the romantic and warm atmosphere of the first two movies. The protagonist’s casting was a bit unsuccessful, and the actor’s performance was relatively unsatisfactory. The children’s film is better than the director of Columbus.
(I originally wanted to give it to Samsung, but this little actor is really uncomfortable to watch. I don’t know why I have such a hostility. Maybe I really want Macaulay to return. After all, his home is too classic. It’s like saying hi to two bad guys triumphantly. It’s just a clever kid! It’s really not good. It’s okay to change to a similar actor. This casting is really unsatisfactory, so I just want to give two stars...)
View more about Home Alone 3 reviews
