Story's Simpson prosecution case has infinite emotions about this long-familiar case, so let's talk a little bit. Although I study law, I am not engaged in legal work or specializing in criminal law, but I am only interested in American law. At the same time, our understanding of the Simpson case is not particularly comprehensive, and we know about the same as everyone else, which makes our judgment somewhat biased, because there are too many things displayed in the ten-month trial of the case, and we are just peeking at it. The following are just personal opinions and can be discussed. If there is any mistake, please feel free to comment. It must be admitted that we will never know what the truth is. At the same time, people with basic legal knowledge and awareness of the rule of law should be able to reach a consensus that, as far as the trial of the case is concerned, even if many out-of-court factors are excluded, Simpson's innocence is an acceptable result. In short, it is probably procedural justice. Reasonable doubt and other legal principles. Different criminal and civil outcomes are also old-fashioned, one needs to be beyond reasonable doubt, and the other uses preponderance of evidence. Different standards will result in different results. Next, let's talk about the core of the main question, why "think" Simpson is the murderer. Guilty and innocence and whether he is believed to be a murderer or possibly a murderer are two entirely different issues. To put it simply, because life is not a court, everyone can have their own "views", not to mention, this view is not groundless, but also a tendentious judgment based on existing evidence. Tendency, Tendency, Tendency, important things said three times. Like the civil court verdict, I do feel that Simpson is the most likely murderer. (Except for the victim's family, probably no one in the world dares to say that Simpson must be a murderer, and no one can conclude that Simpson is not a murderer, except Simpson himself) The subject believes that it is not a murderer, mainly based on the court's verdict and blood evidence The loopholes (praise the subject's rational and objective attitude) are completely understandable and acceptable. But in addition to blood evidence, there is a lot of other evidence. Other bloodstains that didn't go wrong, eyewitness testimony, circumstantial evidence, a history of domestic violence, and the famous manhunt of the century that led to Simpson's escape after the crime. These may not be enough to convict in court, but they are enough to skew my personal judgment. In addition, the blood evidence of the problem may be a forensic error, or it may be framed. Again, the possibility of framing is really too small. Officer Foreman may be a racist bastard, but it would be absurd to assume that he wanted to frame Simpson in the first place. He wasn't even sure Simpson would have a perfect alibi. "Missing" 1. Can 5cc blood really construct a crime scene? Probably, the most difficult to justify evidence is really gloves. Because our information is all one-sided and indirect, I really don't know what's going on with the gloves. All in all, everyone has the right to make their own judgments and guesses. As long as they don’t spread rumors, don’t try to draw conclusions, and don’t try to attack others, it’s acceptable. Agree to disagree. With the Simpson case, all we're talking about are possibilities. People who think he is the murderer are indeed in the majority, but not all over the world. Of course, I don't rule out that some people here are just copying what others say. As for the mention of Simpson's book as the reason why "the whole world thinks he is a murderer", I can't agree. That's been the case before, and it may add a little weight to those who think he's a murderer, but it doesn't matter, and people who think he's not a murderer are unlikely to change their minds. With such a high-profile case, anyone can write a vivid novel that conforms to all known facts. What's more, he wrote the book because he was forced to make money to make a living, not because of the mentality of showing off like a murderer. The core of the main question is finished, let's say something off-topic. While the results are acceptable from a purely logical point of view, there is no doubt that the verdict was influenced by racism. Including the jury, Forman's recorded evidence, public opinion, and the fact that both the prosecution and the defense are black, this case is doomed to be inseparable from race from the beginning. In the show, the first episode opens with real footage of the massive racial strife and riots in Los Angeles sparked by the Rodney King case in the early 1990s. In the final episode, there are also real images before and after the sentencing. The cheers of blacks, the surprise of whites, and the polls after the results were released can all show how deeply race has affected the case. As for the decisive factor in the case, whether it was a question of evidence or a racial factor, probably the 12 jurors themselves could not tell. Let's talk about the end of the event. The civil judgment Simpson was "responsible" for the deaths of the two (it didn't say he was the murderer, which the subject may have misunderstood), and awarded $33 million in compensation, but the actual compensation was less than 500,000. Simpson moved to Florida to save his property, and he also won custody of his two children, despite attempts by Nicole's family. However, Simpson was sentenced to 33 years in prison for armed robbery in 2008, with a possibility of parole for 17 years. And, star Kardashian's father, Robert Kardashian, a friend of Simpson's and a member of his lawyers, admitted he had doubts about his friend's innocence after the case was over. And the two never communicated again. Will this fact have any impact on the subject? Finally, Amway will strongly play this American drama, the Simpson prosecution case in the first season of American Crime Story, which is not one of the best American dramas of the year. It may also give you a lot of inspiration and emotion. (The characters in the play have a high degree of reduction, especially the black prosecutors are exactly the same) (Yes, the purpose of my answer is Amway 233) The public prosecution case is not one of the best American dramas of the year. It may also give you a lot of inspiration and emotion. (The characters in the play have a high degree of reduction, especially the black prosecutors are exactly the same) (Yes, the purpose of my answer is Amway 233) The public prosecution case is not one of the best American dramas of the year. It may also give you a lot of inspiration and emotion. (The characters in the play have a high degree of reduction, especially the black prosecutors are exactly the same) (Yes, the purpose of my answer is Amway 233)
View more about The Collini Case reviews
