I saw some people comment that it was the film's fault that the autopsy expert didn't find the head and body of the corpse didn't belong to the same person at first, and the professor's assistant didn't find that the professor messed up the bottles in the autopsy room, that like The scolding police allowed the professor to interrogate and even beat the criminal suspect Li Shenghao, Min Ruiying was knocked down in front of the professor's car window with a stick, and there was no police investigation, and Li Shenghao, who was walking on crutches, would hurry up to hide the professor's woman's body at the end of the film. house?
I just want to say, please, these can indeed be used as unreasonable places, but it does not affect the narrative of the movie! Even if you express the real things you have experienced, as long as there is a turning point, others may think: How is this possible? This is unreasonable!
The first forensic doctor in South Korea did not find that the dissected corpse was different from the head. This is a foreshadowing of the focus of the film. He admired the beautiful carcass of the corpse and dissected it skillfully. Later, he even injected semen into the corpse for perjury. These obscenities His actions all paved the way for the sadness, anger and powerlessness that he later found out that this body was his own daughter. It was also a huge irony. In order to save his own daughter, he pushed other people's daughters into the abyss. In retribution, he also killed an innocent daughter.
As for the fact that his assistant didn't find any abnormalities in the autopsy room, the policewoman was beaten and not held accountable, the lame man ran so fast, etc. These are all irrelevant matters and can be ignored, because the audience can make up their own minds to explain.
I write this, not to brag about how flawless this movie is, but to feel that indulging in these logics and common sense will prevent us from objectively evaluating the more connotations of this tragic story. The title of the film is Unforgivable, and it is really the finishing touch. In order to collect enough medical expenses for his daughter, the professor used a scientific autopsy report as a guise to do perjury, resulting in the acquittal of the three rich young masters who gang-raped the daughter of a commoner. The victims were destroyed and ruined. When hatred has been buried, how can one be forgiven? Is it really okay to kneel in front of the victim's family and cry and apologize? Therefore, until he shot the murderer who killed his daughter, he still couldn't forgive himself for the same sin, the big mistake had been made, and everything was irreversible!
Speaking of which, it is really not difficult to find the unreasonable places in the film. Take the key corpse as an example. The corpse has been in the wilderness for several days, and it should have rotted long ago. The maggots and stench are accompanied by the professors on the dissection table. Praise! Even if it is only for a long time, the corpse will be swollen and there will be terrifying corpse spots. And after the movie, the professor finally found the place where his daughter's body was hidden near the dam. Look at that time, Hye Won, who had been dead for a long time, still had exquisite makeup. The beautiful red petals are piled on the body, please, the petals rot very quickly, okay? Is that Park Chengxi wearing a hat so diligent in changing petals? Furthermore, Li Shenghao wanted to take revenge for his sister who was raped and murdered. As a result, the three wealthy sons who directly abused him were able to die happily. Instead, the professor who just provided perjury wanted to deliberately plan for him for a long time, so that he could receive the greatest revenge?
View more about No Mercy reviews
