I don’t know why, in the middle of the movie, when it was mentioned that the loss caused by the rescue was too great and decided to give up the excavation, what I thought of was the sentence that the lawyer once said in the movie "The Distance Between Us and Evil", "He kills people, he deserves to die, but democracy Should we be buried with the law?", it may be a better choice to give up the rescue based on the advantages and disadvantages, but should the country's reputation and laws and regulations be buried together? The president said that he would do his best to rescue, but in the end it was nothing. It was obviously the construction team cutting corners. Why should innocent people be held responsible? How to cultivate a sense of trust in the country and a sense of belonging among the people, isn't it just relying on these things that even if there is only a little hope, they will go all out?
Personally, I think the filming is better, but the portrayal of the characters is not detailed enough, the support for the male protagonist's survival and beliefs are not enough, and the details of the female protagonist before going to the radio station are not enough. Secondly, I feel that the film wants to criticize too many things. For example, in order to grab front page headlines in the news industry, government officials in order to appear in front of the media, and the cooperation between rescue teams, they have not been particularly profound, and there is a superficial feeling. I believe it would be better if I only talked about the criticism of the news industry and portrayed the male protagonist more fully.
Human life is the most valuable thing.
2020.2.5 night
View more about Tunnel reviews