Hard core, but not hard enough

Alisha 2022-01-01 08:01:50

This film will become a classic if it takes more thought and money, more time and brain.
This is a typical hardcore science fiction, in the near future, everything conforms to the laws of physics, and there is no eye-stimulating lens. The ending gives a hypothesis about the origin of mankind, which is more imaginative.
However, some details can be done better. The scenes on Mars were obviously taken with filters in the desert, but can the thin atmosphere of Mars form such a rich layer of clouds in the sky? The
most failing is that face. The defense mechanism is too "magic", if the signal is wrong, if the people on Mars really don't want other wisdom except the earth to know, the simpler way is to hide rather than destroy. Even if it is destroyed, there is no need to get such a "sandworm"? low efficiency.
But flying to the stars at the end is really touching and exciting. What we need is such science fiction.

View more about Mission to Mars reviews

Extended Reading
  • Janie 2022-03-26 09:01:07

    There was a big problem with the choice of content, and a large number of scenes were spent on meaningless plots. The production level of the Mars exploration drama, which is the most important in the script but accounts for very little of the actual film length, is only unsatisfactory. This totally degenerate version of "A Space Odyssey" can't get my praise.

  • Brenda 2022-03-28 09:01:05

    "Gravity" + "Putometheus" + "Contact in Time and Space"! The level of 2000 has reached this level is very good! The picture is a bit slag, and the content and ideas are there. It's a little bit worse from the classics. As an entertaining sci-fi film, it's pretty good! !

Mission to Mars quotes

  • Woody Blake: You're just not man enough to wear jewelry.

  • Jim McConnell: There's pressure in here.

    Terri Fisher: Above Mars atmospheric? That's impossible.

    Jim McConnell: We're millions of miles from Earth inside a giant white face. What's impossible?