There are no unbreakable couples, only mistresses who don't work hard. This little guy was also successful.
In the eyes of the Russians who are eager for the image of a fatherly tsar, perhaps any character can be reversed. Today is Kolchak, tomorrow will be Denikin, the day after tomorrow, Stalin, whether it is red or white, proud A handsome man is a good leader.
It is a pity that at that time, the heroic Kolchak was on the wrong side of history; fortunately, now, he has been invited back to the screen like a hero. History may not be ironic, the Russians follow such heroes without grounds.
Aside from these out-of-context treatment of history, as a war film, the film's atmosphere and cheerfulness are fully presented.
A wine glass fell, and half was broken in 1916, which was the last extravagance of the Imperial Russian Palace ball, an elegant waltz; the other half was broken in 1964, which was the clumsy mechanical scene of the Soviet film studio in 1964, which was unification. broadcast gymnastics.
The director Kraf Cook obviously misses the imperial Russia, which is filled with aristocratic feeling. Therefore, he does not need to let the orphans wait until they adopt their Italian parents in the previous work "Finding the Beginning of Happiness", because the spiritual parents that the director is looking for are Emperor Russia and the loving father who sat on the Mogilev bench in the military headquarters of World War I. The tsar, Kolchak, who went to the uprising sailors and dropped his weapon -- his sword -- contemptuously, "Bolsheviks, you are not qualified to hand over my weapons."
Krafcook's choice had already been made, so a A love war movie with an alternate history was staged.
View more about Admiral reviews
