In fact, Kolchak is just a poor symbol used by the producers in this film. He is famous enough and controversial. The subject matter can be a topic of conversation, become the center of public opinion, and can win the box office. Considering this benchmark, let's add a bit of a poignant and a little deviant love that imitated Zhivago. Well, according to the naive Chinese-style revolutionary romanticism of the year, that's all!
Qi is Qi, but it's better for the packagers to give up the expectation of watching this as a historical film. The whole movie is based on the grand Qiong Yao drama as the core line. If you expect to see a slightly more complete war scene, you have to be patient and watch flirting first. As for the description of the Russian Revolution, it's not that directors, screenwriters, and producers ignore the historical background and beautify Tsarist Russia. People don't care about it at all. It's just that a screen hero needs a group of bastards to foil, so it doesn't matter whether his opponent is or not Really bastard, for the box office victory and glory, brother, please don't be shy...
Well, this has been downgraded from a historical film to the height of Titanic, but from the height of Titanic, this film is still shot Very choppy. The recent commercial films in Russia are very popular, but the old Maozi gives me the feeling that the tradition of telling stories in the simple films of the former Soviet Union is gone. Except for the visual, it is the visual - and there is nothing new in the visual, such as this one. , in addition to slow motion, or slow motion, the scene arrangement and the control of the story rhythm are messed up.
The old leftists want to use this batch to reverse the case, but you are looking for the wrong object. This film is nothing but an extramarital affair in a revolutionary era...
View more about Admiral reviews
