When it comes to refugees, like most people on the Internet, I thought it was a foolish decision to admit refugees to the Mother of God. After watching this documentary, I had a different idea. In the Internet age, all information from afar comes from the media. The processed information and the provocativeness of spectators often make it difficult to understand the whole picture and make people comment in a hurry. I have also seen the photos of refugees exposing their bodies on the beach, but they did not stir up any fluctuations in my heart. I have seen many more tragic scenes in movies. This is just a story from afar. The people at the center of the storm have no right to speak, they are just a symbol. In many news stories, the people who tell the story are just a unilateral group of people. The feelings and thoughts of the parties are often ignored, so when I watch When it comes to human beings, when refugees tell their stories, I am shocked. Why have the people who should be most qualified to speak have been silenced in the field of public opinion for so long? What's even more sad is that I don't see anything wrong with this at all. Everyone should have a voice. In fact, it embodies human rights.
Human rights, when people's interests are violated, have been pulled out as an alternative to venting anger in the Western world. But it is not wrong in itself. It should be a goal we pursue. In fact, most ordinary people have such a relatively happy life now, thanks to the popularization of human rights thinking. Maybe human rights are currently being used as weapons by some countries, so that we have some PTSD on the word human rights, but it should not be stigmatized.
"I'm not for poverty, I'm for moderation, but we have developed a society of consumption that is constantly seeking to grow, and when it doesn't grow, it's a tragedy. We create a lot of unnecessary demand, and you have to keep growing. Buying things, then throwing them away, that's the life we squander. When I buy something, or when you buy it, we don't pay for money, we pay for the time in life that we have to make money, the difference is, we You can't buy life, it just flies, and worse, waste your life and lose your freedom."
In addition to this, I also want to say that the distribution is uneven, continuous production will only lead to a greater gap between the rich and the poor, a lifetime of hard work, nothing, and the environmental damage in the age of consumption. I've been unable to understand macroeconomics, what does it mean for people to continuously pursue the rise of data? A lot of production capacity is wasted, and we also need to pay for the wasted production capacity, which can bring nothing but waste and inflation, making us faster and busier. In this day and age, people are treated as data.
View more about Human reviews
