choice

Erich 2022-04-19 09:02:53

Just two films this year mentioned the kings of Denmark and Norway, both of which are parliamentary constitutional monarchies. That is, the nominal leader of the state, but the actual parliament is the highest authority (the king of Norway is also an elected king). One chooses to surrender to save the people when the war starts, and the other chooses to fight to the end, even at the expense of abdication. Although Denmark ended up losing relatively little in World War II, Norway had a relatively difficult time because of the pig teammates. But before the major decision in history, they all bravely made the decision that might be correct at the time, and took the courage to take it. I like Nordic movies more and more, and there are strong emotions under the cold surface.

View more about The King's Choice reviews

Extended Reading
  • Nedra 2022-04-22 07:01:53

    #NorwayFilm Week# is as cold as the Nordic weather. The German ambassador is more brilliant than the protagonist. The protagonist has a dead face in everything he does. Although there is no problem with his choice, the negotiation scene seems to be the king as a villain. This person is too thief. It stands to reason that such a thing is unlikely to happen to a constitutional monarchy. If a king with no real power is useful, what is the use of parliament?

  • Cleve 2022-03-19 09:01:09

    It’s great, the royal family, German ambassadors, front-line commanders, and ordinary soldiers have multiple angles, and you don’t even realize that the mediation, meetings, battles, and decisions all take place in just two days. The fate of the individual and the fate of the group is the most moving part of history